Skip to content

feat: unify daily digest sections and source coverage - #1081

Merged
Pigbibi merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/unified-operator-format
Nov 6, 2026
Merged

Pigbibi merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/unified-operator-format

Conversation

@Pigbibi

@Pigbibi Pigbibi commented Nov 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AI assistance

Codex (GPT-6; host-selected configuration).

What changed

Render consolidated daily summaries in Result, Scope, Evidence, Coverage and Next step sections, with explicit six-source coverage and unknown counts preserved. Keep each active account's equity and holdings below its own header. Reserve required execution/evidence diagnostics together with their account context, preserving caller order during truncation. Select account summaries before optional observations; reject budgets that cannot contain required contextual failures.

The presentation manifest records its immutable upstream revision/hash and the bounded local context patch with the current file hash. Existing routing, receipts, count validation, execution authority and the legacy renderer retain their existing behavior.

Verification

Both P2 regressions fail on the prior exact head and pass on the fix. Adverse baseline: 3 tests / 7 failures. Focused suite: 95 passed. Full Python suite: 1140 tests, 10 existing skips, exit 0. Display/config generation checks, runtime-settings validation, documentation and diff checks passed (one existing README advisory). Gitleaks 8.30.1 scans of the fix commit and full PR commit range: zero leaks. The directory scan's three unchanged matches are two Git revisions and one SHA-256 integrity pin.

Risk

Presentation only. Required account-specific failures may exceed a small one-message budget and now fail explicitly rather than losing attribution. No sources, delivery paths, labels, execution switches or production configuration are changed. This PR remains Draft; runtime adoption and delivery are unverified.

Central publication checker

publication-check/2.0-advisory (build 83d9d1130377), advisory; total matches: 3940; matching lines: 3937. Complete tracked candidate tree scanned. These advisory matches do not themselves block publication. First 20 matches (masked):

  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:4: /.github/CODEOWNERS @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:5: /.github/workflows/ @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:6: /actions/publish-runtime-execution-evidence/ @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:7: /python/scripts/check_credential_maintenance_read.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:8: /python/scripts/credential_maintenance_notify.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:9: /python/scripts/deployment_bundle_contract.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:10: /python/scripts/deterministic_risk_gate.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:11: /python/scripts/execution_evidence_projection.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:12: /python/scripts/forward_observation_risk_control.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:13: /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_composer.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:14: /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_composer_v2.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:15: /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_observation_ingress.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:16: /python/scripts/long_horizon_risk_observation_ingress_v2.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:17: /python/scripts/paper_risk_admission_receipt.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:18: /schemas/qsl-deployment-bundle.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:19: /schemas/qsl-forward-observation-risk-control.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:20: /schemas/qsl-reconcile-only-risk-control.v1.schema.json @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:21: /scripts/provision_binance_recovery_credentials.sh @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:22: /scripts/provision_soxl_v7_review_credential.py @<PROJECT_ID>
  • repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:23: /web/strategy-switch-console/application/console_api/strategy_execution.js @<PROJECT_ID>

Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>

Pigbibi commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

Please review exact head commit 89eaf25d292acaddf57a32524c6a3f962f040393 and publish a codex-review-state:v1 marker bound to that full commit_sha, including status and has_unresolved_findings.

Review request only. Job: notify-codex-request-r1.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 6, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-06T06:24:56.385137Z 2c61cea Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 89eaf25d29

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread python/scripts/unified_daily_digest.py Resolved
@Pigbibi

Pigbibi commented Nov 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

Please review exact head commit 2c61cea740d74ffcc6a9dff49fca8efb84192e27 and publish a codex-review-state:v1 marker bound to that full commit_sha, including status and has_unresolved_findings.

The two prior account-context P2 findings are addressed with fail-before/pass-after regression evidence. This PR remains Draft. Job: qrs1081-findings-fix-r1.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: 2c61cea740

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@Pigbibi
Pigbibi marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2026 06:22
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi merged commit 7f4d37c into main Nov 6, 2026
20 of 23 checks passed
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi deleted the feat/unified-operator-format branch November 6, 2026 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant