Skip to content

feat(observation): verify the HK snapshot over internal ingress - #729

Merged
Pigbibi merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/hk-internal-snapshot-verification
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

Pigbibi merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/hk-internal-snapshot-verification

Conversation

@Pigbibi

@Pigbibi Pigbibi commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

AI assistance

Codex (GPT-6).

What changed

Add a manual Google Cloud Workflows definition to verify the existing internal HK account snapshot. The workflow uses one fixed authenticated GET, checks the account binding and freshness, and returns only field counts and observation time.

How verified

Parsed the workflow YAML and verified the request and response shape. Documentation and staged secret checks passed. The first authenticated HK read requires deploying this reviewed definition in the same GCP project.

Why

The HK Cloud Run service accepts only internal requests and the configured legacy probe job is absent. A hosted GitHub runner cannot verify the snapshot directly.

Risk

R2. Production observation only. The manual workflow has no trading request, arguments, schedule, archive writes, or notification action. Deployment supplies its own dedicated invocation identity, turns off call logging, and leaves the existing service ingress and switches untouched.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-11T10:57:17.601479Z fdc42a3 New commits
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-11T10:58:40.161639Z fdc42a3 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 38260e642f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@Pigbibi Pigbibi added the agent-approved An agent cleared this high-risk change on the current head; not an owner confirmation label Nov 11, 2026
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi merged commit a12835a into main Nov 11, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi deleted the fix/hk-internal-snapshot-verification branch November 11, 2026 11:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

agent-approved An agent cleared this high-risk change on the current head; not an owner confirmation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant