[Pigbibi]

AI assistance

OpenAI Codex, gpt-6.1-sol.

Why

M03 historical Scheduler metadata GETs were denied. Owner decision t1293s7520=A authorizes this Draft only: propose project-level GET-only access for the existing Box reader in the logical longbridge-paper project. The prior m03-readonly-iam-draft-r1 correctly concluded BLOCKED_MINIMAL_GRANT_UNSUPPORTED under consumed authority t1293s7513=A; this PR does not reuse that authority or any earlier mutation approval.

What changed

• Define custom role paperSchedulerJobsGet with exactly cloudscheduler.jobs.get, plus an inert single-binding template for the existing grok-gcp-ro reader. Private project and SA values stay in protected configuration; unresolved mappings block later application. No new identity or trust.
• This is a project-level binding covering all Scheduler jobs in the PAPER project, not just the three known jobs. Scheduler job-level IAM and resource-attribute conditions are unsupported; no three-job condition is claimed.
• No list, run, update, pause, resume, delete or create permission; no broader viewer/editor role. The files have no executable apply entry point or workflow wiring.
• Image metadata grant is deferred / OWNER_NEEDED_FOLLOWUP and explicitly outside this Draft. Historical denial was PERMISSION_DENIED with missing_permissions=[]; classification remains UNKNOWN_PERMISSION_CLASS. No image role is guessed.

How verified

JSON syntax and the exact one-permission role/single project binding were checked offline. Documentation style: 0 blocking findings, 1 existing README advisory. git diff --check passed. No executable code changed; runtime tests/full suite and fail-before/pass-after are N/A. No IAM/five-gap re-probe was run. Historical evidence is not fresh runtime proof.

Cloud mutations=0; iam_apply=0; cloud API requests=0. PAPER remains stopped; READY_FOR_START_CARD=false. No label, merge, undraft, deploy, Secret access, Scheduler enablement or protected-switch change. A separate owner exact-revision merge/apply card is required; later apply must use protected <PROJECT_ID> Actions/Environment credentials, dry-run first, before/after readback and preserve unrelated IAM state. This Draft does not establish effective IAM or PAPER readiness.

Evidence references

• m03-readonly-iam-draft-r1/out/REPORT.md, out/result.json, out/scheduler-iam-support.safe.txt, and final.txt: prior unsupported three-job boundary.
• m03-safety-evidence-fivegap-r1/out/report.md, out/REPORT.md, out/reproof.safe.json, out/result.json: historical denials only; not rerun.
• env-readonly-isolate-draft-r1/final.txt: repository readback-route separation pattern.
• gcp-ro-sa-actions-plan-r1/out/REPORT.md, out/runbook-actions.md, out/approval-items.md: naming/context only, no twelve-tuple apply authority consumed.

AI author: OpenAI Codex, gpt-6.1-sol.

Central publication checker (advisory)

publication-check/2.0-advisory; build 83d9d1130377; complete tracked candidate tree total matches 1478; matching lines 1467. The advisory scan does not change native gates. Existing candidate-tree matches are disclosed; matching values are masked below.

First 20 (file:line and masked text):

• repo/.env.example:21: TELEGRAM_TOKEN=<<HOST>>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:7: /.env.example @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:8: /.github/CODEOWNERS @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:9: /.github/workflows/ @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:10: /application/account_new_risk_gate_support.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:11: /application/durable_execution_commands.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:12: /application/execution_receipt_adapter.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:13: /application/execution_service.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:14: /application/execution_state.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:15: /application/longbridge_execution.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:16: /application/paper_execution_command_consumer.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:17: /application/paper_strategy_risk_state.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:18: /runtime_execution_policy.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/CODEOWNERS:19: /scripts/execution_report_heartbeat.py @<PROJECT_ID>
• repo/.github/dot-review/review.cjs:106: const token = <REDACTED> core.getIDToken(audienceText); // Exact bytes; URL normalization may change an audience.
• repo/.github/dot-review/review.cjs:190: const <PROJECT_ID> = {...pr,head:{...pr.head,sha:pair.target},base:{...pr.base,sha:pair.base}};
• repo/.github/dot-review/review.cjs:191: const binding = {...b.binding({repository:trust.repo.full_name,pr:<PROJECT_ID>,policyCommit:trust.commit,files},trust.policySha),
• repo/.github/dot-review/test-review.cjs:81: const content='<PROJECT_ID> source\n', sourceSHA='d'.repeat(40);
• repo/.github/dot-review/test-review.cjs:82: const pr={number:7,changed_files:1,commits:1,title:'<PROJECT_ID> change',body:'<PROJECT_ID> body',
• repo/.github/dot-review/test-review.cjs:100: assert.equal(audience,'https://audience.example.test');return '<PROJECT_ID>-only';},summary};

Risk

Documentation only. Separate exact-revision owner authority t1293s7526=B permits merge and one bounded IAM apply through an existing protected Actions entrypoint only. This PR supplies no apply entrypoint. PAPER remains stopped; READY_FOR_START_CARD=false.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-06T07:46:52.609892Z	1c1a44b	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[Pigbibi]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: 1c1a44ba03

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".