Skip to content

Refactor the California state supplement: state-share parameters and person-level amounts #7892

Open

Description

@hua7450

Summary

Rewritten 2026-11-02 as the refactor plan. The earlier versions are in this issue's edit history.

California's State Supplementary Payment has two structural problems, and two stacked PRs address them:

  1. Combined totals: the parameters store federal plus state totals, so each federal cost-of-living adjustment cuts the modeled supplement until someone edits ten files. Store California state supplement parameters as state shares #10600 stores California's share instead.
  2. Unit-level amounts: the formula adds amounts across the SPM unit, while California sets one standard for each recipient or married couple. Compute the California state supplement per person #10601 computes the supplement per person.

Problem 1: parameters store combined totals

The model has the 2027 federal rates ($1,029 individual, $1,544 couple), but California's totals stop at 2026. From January 2027 the supplement falls $35 a month for an individual and $53 for a couple, unless ten files are edited again. California's share has barely moved:

State share (monthly) Jan 2025 Jan 2026 Jan 2027 (projected)
Aged or disabled 239.94 239.94 239.94
Blind 324.32 324.32 324.32
Aged or disabled, no cooking 368.81 368.81 368.81
Disabled minor 97.27 97.27 97.27
Non-medical out-of-home care 632.07 632.07 632.07
Title XIX facility 32 32 32
Couple, aged or disabled 607.83 607.83 607.83
Couple, blind 833.35 833.35 833.35
Couple, blind with aged or disabled 747.44 747.44 747.44
Couple, no cooking 865.57 865.57 865.57
Couple, non-medical out-of-home care 1,748.14 1,761.14 1,779.14
Couple, Title XIX facility 64 64 64

Sources: the "State Supplement Level" column in POMS SI 01415.057 and SI 01415.058, and the CDSS 2026 May Revision tables. The January 2027 column is a May projection using a 3.8% federal adjustment rather than the final rate. The couple out-of-home care share moves because CDSS doubles the individual grant and then subtracts the SSI component; at the final 2027 rates it is $1,778.14.

Problem 2: amounts are added across the SPM unit

The law pays recipients and married couples, not SPM units or families:

  • WIC 12150: people receiving SSI, or "who but for their income" could, "are entitled to receive state supplementation".
  • WIC 12200: "An aged, blind or disabled applicant or recipient shall be paid an amount of aid which when added to his or her federal benefit" and other income "equals the following".
  • 20 CFR 416.2025(b): "Countable income of an eligible individual or eligible couple" reduces the payment.
  • CDSS SSI Total Monthly Payment Amounts 2026 and POMS SI 01415.058 B.2 list single-person and couple levels only.
WIC 12200 Category Nature
(a)-(d) Blind, aged or disabled, independent Alternative
(e) No cooking facilities Additive, only under (c) or (d)
(f) Disabled minor with a parent, guardian or relative Alternative
(g) Non-medical out-of-home care Alternative
(h) Medical facility personal needs Alternative
(i) Another person's household Reduces (a)-(d) by the federal reduction

Monthly ca_state_supplement for January 2026, calculated on main at cd06476, against the POMS SI 01415.058 level:

Household Model today POMS level
Aged, out-of-home care 1,393.25 632.07
Aged couple, both in out-of-home care 2,914.45 1,761.14
Aged, Title XIX facility 1,265.94 32
Aged couple, both in a Title XIX facility 2,162.83 64
Aged, another person's household 571.27 245.20
Blind child with a parent 97.27 324.32
Disabled dependent aged 20 with a parent 0 239.94
Disabled child in out-of-home care 97.27 632.07
Disabled child in a Title XIX facility 1,061.27 32
Unrelated aged and blind people in one SPM unit 0 564.26
Unrelated aged people in one SPM unit 110.83 479.88
Aged, ineligible spouse earning $2,000 a month 0 239.94 (POMS SI 01320.430 D)

An aged person who declines SSI also gets $1,233.94 today, though SSA pays the supplement with SSI. The unit-level design forces workarounds elsewhere: SNAP's unit-level income list, San Bernardino General Relief projecting the amount down to people, and CAPI estimating the spouse's share pro rata. CAPI, CT, GA, MI and MN already compute person-level amounts and add them up.

Plan

  1. Mark disabled dependent children eligible for the California state supplement #10554: correct the eligibility flag for dependent children, with no change to SSP amounts.
  2. Store California state supplement parameters as state shares #10600: state-share parameters. No change in 2025 or 2026, and needed before January 2027.
  3. Compute the California state supplement per person #10601, stacked on Store California state supplement parameters as state shares #10600: ca_state_supplement_person with one state share per living arrangement through the shared ssi_state_supplement helper. ca_state_supplement keeps its name and adds up the person-level amounts, so API callers keep working.

Still open after these PRs

References

Activity

  1. hua7450 commented on Oct 29, 2026

    @hua7450
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Two updates from PR #10546 (open), which stops the no-cooking allowance from stacking on the blind rates:

    • The "Blind and no cooking" item above. With Stop the California state supplement from adding the no-cooking allowance to the blind rates #10546 the standard is max(blind amount, aged or disabled amount + allowance). The aged blind single person without cooking gets $1,362.81 instead of $1,447.19, and an aged couple with one blind spouse $2,356.57 instead of $2,496.18.
    • Two unmarried eligible people in one SPM unit still get one individual standard. Example, January 2026, no cooking facilities: an aged person (70) and an unrelated blind person (50), each the head of their own tax unit, in one SPM unit. The unit standard is max(blind 1,318.32, aged 1,233.94) plus the allowance. On main the allowance is $128.87 (standard $1,447.19); with Stop the California state supplement from adding the no-cooking allowance to the blind rates #10546 it is $44.49 (standard $1,362.81). Each person is entitled to their own standard: $1,318.32 + $1,362.81 = $2,681.13. Both model values leave out one person's whole individual standard. The unit-level structure is the cause; a per-person standard would fix it. No test covers this household.
  2. changed the title [-]CA SSP: payment standard double-counts for facility residents and stores combined totals requiring annual updates[/-] [+]Refactor the California state supplement: state-share parameters and person-level amounts[/+] on Nov 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions