You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
A child's business loss turns the SSI student exclusion negative and gives an eligible child an allocation (20 CFR 416.1165(b)) #10558
When a child's SSI earned income nets below zero, two formulas pass the loss into parental deeming.
ssi_blind_or_disabled_working_student_exclusion.py lines 17-19 takes the smaller of the monthly limit and monthly earnings and sets no floor at zero, so −$3,000 of earnings gives a −$3,000 exclusion. ssi_unearned_income_deemed_from_ineligible_parent.py lines 25-31 then subtracts that exclusion from the parents' earned income, which adds $3,000 to it.
ssi_ineligible_child_allocation.py lines 13-21 returns max_(0, allocation - income). An eligible child's allocation equals zero, so −$3,000 of income gives that child a $3,000 allocation. The deeming formula sums allocations across the tax unit (lines 37-39) and takes the total off the parents' income.
What the law says
20 CFR 416.1112(c)(3) excludes a student's earned income up to monthly and yearly limits, so a child with no earnings has nothing to exclude. 416.1165(b) deducts "an allocation for each ineligible child in the household", while an eligible child receives deemed income under paragraph (e). 416.1163(b)(2) reduces a child's allocation by the child's income and provides no increase for a loss.
Hand-computed case
A parent, 45, in Texas in 2026 has $30,000 of wages and a $6,000 private pension and reports one own child. Their child, 10, meets the disability criteria, takes up SSI, and has $1,000 of wages and a $4,000 Schedule C loss. I ran this at 035a1570, and the three formulas read the same on main.
Student exclusion
Child's allocation
Deemed from parent
ssi, child
Model
−3,000
3,000
6,942
5,226
By hand
0
0
8,442
3,726
The model raises the parents' earned income to $33,000 and cuts their unearned income to $3,000. It deems (3,000 − 240) + (33,000 − 780) / 2 − 11,928 = 6,942 and pays 11,928 − (6,942 − 240) = 5,226.
By hand, the parents keep their $30,000 of earnings and their $6,000 pension, which 20 CFR 416.1121(a) counts. The law deems (6,000 − 240) + (30,000 − 780) / 2 − 11,928 = 8,442 and pays 11,928 − (8,442 − 240) = 3,726.
Remove the pension and the two errors cancel. The $3,000 allocation spills from unearned to earned income and takes back the $3,000 the exclusion added. The model then deems (30,000 − 1,020) / 2 − 11,928 = 2,562 and pays $9,606, the same as the hand figure.
Possible fix
Floor the exclusion at zero.
Floor income at zero in ssi_ineligible_child_allocation.py. That gives an eligible child no allocation and stops a loss from lifting an ineligible child's allocation above the full amount.
How a business loss offsets a person's other earnings, which #10531 leaves open. Either way the child has no countable earnings and the parents' income stays whole, so the $3,726 holds.
I changed the worked case from $6,000 of taxable interest to a $6,000 private pension. 20 CFR 416.1124(c)(22) excludes interest from a countable resource, and 416.1161(a)(26) does the same for a parent. The $3,726 I first posted doesn't hold for savings interest, and #10079 tracks that treatment.
416.1121(a) counts a private pension. With one, the model at 035a1570 returns the same −$3,000 exclusion, $3,000 allocation, $6,942 deemed and $5,226 of ssi, so the $3,726 comparison in the issue stands.
Activity
MaxGhenis commentedon Oct 31, 2026
I changed the worked case from $6,000 of taxable interest to a $6,000 private pension. 20 CFR 416.1124(c)(22) excludes interest from a countable resource, and 416.1161(a)(26) does the same for a parent. The $3,726 I first posted doesn't hold for savings interest, and #10079 tracks that treatment.
416.1121(a) counts a private pension. With one, the model at
035a1570returns the same −$3,000 exclusion, $3,000 allocation, $6,942 deemed and $5,226 ofssi, so the $3,726 comparison in the issue stands.Keep a spouse's business loss out of CT SSP and MD PAA applicant earn…