Repository navigation
BLS deck: why we built the emulator, funding, versions and releases, Axiom, What's next - #74
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…se them yet) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…lan, What's next section Adds the motivation slide (why PolicyEngine built a TAXSIM emulator), a funding strip and recounted test files and contributors on PolicyEngine today, a Versions and releases slide, and an Axiom transition-plan slide. Section 05 becomes What's next: the 2026 rules, Axiom, then the CE pilot. Thesia Garner's question list is answered in the notes of the slides that cover each question. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Releases: several merges can share one release; CI checks changelog entries but does not block merges; the pin example needs Python 3.11; PyPI does not keep every PolicyEngine US release. Motivation: the October 2021 launch was PolicyEngine UK, the April 2024 all-states launch was a beta, and the successor quote is attributed to Dan Feenberg's TAXSIM page. Contributors stay at 133 (the API's 136 includes three bots). The #1248 note is updated: NBER closed it on September 29. Axiom slide cites the shipped Belgium pilot of policyengine.py on Axiom. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds slide 30, the federal child and dependent care credit (26 USC 21) running live in Axiom, with the household, the arithmetic, the preview caveats and fallbacks in the notes. SPEAKER-NOTES.md, VALIDATION-SCRIPT.md and README.md now follow the 34-slide order, timings and components, and the checklist adds warming the web runner and rehearsing the Axiom run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… Axiom demo title Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…in its own tab Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…creens At 1280x720 the releases cards and the funding strip ran under the footer. Same approach as DropInTabs: CSS zoom below 820px and 740px of height. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 2021 expansion sits behind an input flag and 2022-2025 law is not encoded; EITC and the other sections do not run live yet (the error varies); the first API call can take about 5 seconds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…er, review fixes Order now follows the speakers: Max (01 introduction), Pavel (02 emulator and demo, 03 beyond TAXSIM), David (04 validation, now ending on the 2026 rules slide he built), Max (05 benefit imputation, a new section, and 06 what's next). Each section divider names its presenter. Agenda, notes, README, SPEAKER-NOTES and VALIDATION-SCRIPT follow the 35-slide order. Review fixes: 'TAXSIM's author on a successor' replaces 'NBER names a successor'; 'could run on Axiom'; the funding strip says grants to date with NSF POSE Phase I dated 2025-26; the pin note says to archive the environment; 'about 1 day' median reply; open-source AI skills; 9 states and DC for heating assistance; deck description no longer CE-only. Layout: short-screen zoom for the Axiom plan and the validation triangle, the 2026 timeline's change panels hide below 960px of height (their content is in the notes), and the cover title clears the logo at 720px. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Notes follow the new order (benefit imputation covers missing data; the demo leads into Beyond TAXSIM); the 2026 timeline notes carry the change panels hidden on short screens; 'Funders to date' on the funding strip; checklist and section-comment fixes. The ce-pilot intro line was removed earlier on purpose: the four numbered steps already say it, and it freed room at 720px. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… axiom.org Slide 7 drops the BEA hero, which read as the motivation; the cards now go microsimulation first, state taxes needed a benchmark, TAXSIM's author on a successor, one model for both uses. The BEA fact moves to the slide 6 notes. Slide 31 embeds axiom.org itself (the home page's rule graph), and the notes and footnote give the path to 26 USC 21: Explore the law, search 'dependent care', graph, Run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Max: listing NBER on 'PolicyEngine today' was odd, since NBER is the day's topic, and the logos already sit on the next slide. The model's figures (95,000+ parameters, 6,000+ variables, 4,932 test files, 103 programs, 133 contributors) move to slide 4, and slide 5 becomes 'Who uses and funds PolicyEngine', with a funders row (Arnold Ventures, NSF, Nuffield, NEO Philanthropy, Pritzker Children's Initiative; logos from policyengine-app-v2's supporters page). The funding and staffing answers move into the notes of slides 5 and 4. Slide 4 gets the freed minute; the deck is 34 slides and still 60 plus 30 minutes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…eld and NEO) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…tivation Two one-minute live slides after 'Who uses and funds PolicyEngine': the OBBBA Household Explorer (57,240 records, 21 provisions each) and CliffWatch on a DC household. They set up why every record's taxes must be right. Slide 4 and the origins slide give up a minute each to keep 60 plus 30; slide numbers from 6 on move up by two in the agenda notes, README, SPEAKER-NOTES and VALIDATION-SCRIPT. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Merged at reviewed head ef76850 after:
CI green (Build, Lint, Tests, Vercel). Deck as presented at BLS on 2026-10-08. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Max's two items from yesterday's prep meetings (the motivation slide and the forward-looking close), plus Thesia Garner's question list (email of October 7) worked into the deck. Max asked for the answers to go where each one fits rather than on a slide of their own.
What changes
uv tool install policyengine-taxsim==3.0.1 --with policyengine-us==2.25.2resolves (checked withuv pip compile).Every figure was checked this morning against PyPI, the GitHub API, the policyengine-us and rulespec-us trees, taxsim.nber.org, the BEA technical document and policyengine.org. An adversarial pass removed one claim: the Axiom-vs-TAXSIM federal run on 87,519 tax units, which compares Axiom with a 2026 TAXSIM test build rather than with the emulator.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code