Repository navigation
docs: active voice in the property income tax post - #1478
Conversation
Wording only, from tonight's voice sweep; no figures, tables or citations change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
hua7450
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed at c188b59. All ten active-voice edits preserve the original meaning and assumptions. Figures, tables, chart JSON, links and citations are unchanged. All 20 invariant and Markdown-parser checks passed. No findings in this wording-only review.
Wording-only check at
|
Active voice in the property income tax post
This is a wording follow-up to the live post merged in #1460 (
018ea750). It applies Max's rule from tonight: use active voice in all written material.What changes: ten sentences in
uk-autumn-budget-2026-property-income-tax.md, from the voice sweep. An independent Opus reviewer passed every pair, and the same sentences changed the same way on the savings draft (#1466). For example:What doesn't change:
The diff has ten lines out and ten in.
Still to come: when dashboard #290 merges, the post's source links move from the pinned dashboard commit
637bb26cto dashboardmain. That goes in this PR if it's still open then, or in a separate one.🤖 Generated with Claude Code