Repository navigation
Dynamics pages: B2's failure and the EPUF fill test - #90
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…rd fallback The paper now reports B2's failure (#89). These pages still described forward earnings only as planned, and the EPUF step as unscored: - learn/index.html: the EPUF sentence and a plain-language B2 sentence; - index.html: the 'Next: forward earnings' card; - paper.html: the wrapper's 'next' text; - progress.html: the baked fallback scorecard, re-baked from microcosm-dynamics#553 (the live page fetches it from master). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
…'s final scorecard - learn: the EPUF 'so far' sentence no longer contradicts the new opening; B2's years are given; the gate table gains B2 and a gate_epuf_fill row; the Earnings and Missing-years bullets name both. - paper.html: the EPUF check is no longer 'planned'; the 'next' entry uses one term for forward earnings. - scorecard/copy.json: Track B is under way (B1 v2 passed; B2 failed); the earnings-test row lists the built ledger and modules, and the historical-earnings row notes that the fill rules fail gate_epuf_fill, with sources. - progress.html: the fallback re-baked from #553 at 40ca2abf. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…nd failed Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Merged at reviewed head d6472e3 (merge commit 3af9373) by the dynamics coordinator. This is the follow-up Max approved alongside publishing #89 (2026-10-20). Gates: Independent review: three GPT-6.1 Sol rounds.
|
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #89, which published the paper's report of B2's failure and of gate_epuf_fill's scores. #89's review found four pages under
dynamics/that still describe forward earnings only as planned, or the Earnings Public-Use File step as unscored:learn/index.html: the limits paragraph now says the EPUF check has scored the career-fill rules, without yet scoring generated earnings or whole careers. A new plain-language sentence before the "We plan" paragraph reports B2's failure: the model's share of people aged 25–44 with no earnings came out about 35% higher than the PSID's, so a successor has to pass first.index.html: the "Next: forward earnings" card adds one sentence on B2's failure.paper.html: the wrapper's "next" text starts with B2's failure and the successor.progress.html: the baked fallback scorecard is re-baked from Progress scorecard: add gate_epuf_fill and B2's failure microcosm-dynamics#553. The live page fetchesscorecard.jsonfrom microcosm-dynamics master, so the fallback should match it. Merge after #553.Every fact comes from microcosm-dynamics master as published in #89: #42 comment 6252752628, and
runs/epuf_fill_gate_test_v1.json.🤖 Generated with Claude Code