Skip to content

PointCloudYC/Industrial3D

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

14 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Industrial3D

📄 Paper: Industrial3D: A Terrestrial LiDAR Point Cloud Dataset and Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for Industrial Infrastructure (Under Review)

⚠️ Dataset Status: Under review. Full dataset and code will be released upon journal paper acceptance. Preview materials (videos, figures) available below.

Overview

Industrial3D is a large-scale, high-resolution point cloud dataset for industrial Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) scene understanding. Furthermore, we benchmark 9 representative methods on the Industrial3D across 4 DL paradigms (fully supervised, weakly supervised, unsupervised, and foundation model).

  • Scale: 612.7 million labeled points from 7 water treatment facilities
  • Resolution: 6mm terrestrial laser scanning (TLS)
  • Diversity: 12 semantic classes (MEP + structural elements)
  • Authenticity: Real industrial environments with realistic occlusion, noise, and complexity

Figures

Graphical Abstract

Figure: Industrial3D graphical abstract showing dataset overview and benchmark framework.

Facility Overview

Figure: Industrial water treatment facility with UAV photography and annotated point cloud examples.

Semantic Classes

Figure: All 12 semantic classes in Industrial3D: Duct, Elbow, Flange, I-beam, Pipe, Pump, Reducer, Rectangular beam, Strainer, Tank, Tee, Valve.

Scene Gallery

Figure: Scene gallery of 4 representative scenes in Industrial3D.

Additional Scenes

Figure: Additional scenes in Industrial3D.

Class Distribution

Figure: Statistical distribution of 612.7M labeled points across 3 tiers. Industrial3D has a 215:1 class imbalance (head:tail), 3.5× more severe than S3DIS.

Scene Videos

20 unique rooms across 13 areas. 4 representative scenes:

# Area Room Split Video
1 Area 2 Service Gallery Train Watch ▶
2 Area 12 SPH Pump Room Test Watch ▶
3 Area 6-1 93m Psu Test Watch ▶
4 Area 3 93m Tank Train Watch ▶

Scene Previews

Service Gallery

Area 2: Service Gallery (Train) - Largest at 79.6M points with highest MEP density

SPH Pump Room

Area 12: SPH Pump Room (Test) - Test set representative with compact equipment

93m Psu

Area 6-1: 93m Psu (Test) - Test set with moderate complexity

93m Tank

Area 3: 93m Tank (Train) - Large tank structure showing geometric diversity

Why these 4:

  • Service Gallery: Largest at 79.6M points with highest MEP density
  • SPH Pump Room: Test set representative with compact equipment
  • 93m Psu: Test set with moderate complexity
  • 93m Tank: Large tank structure showing geometric diversity

📁 Full dataset coming soon! All 20 rooms (RGB + ground truth videos and renders) will be uploaded to Google Drive upon paper acceptance. Current preview materials available (videos, renders). Stay tuned for the complete collection!

Dataset Statistics

Metric Value
Total Scanned Area 20,000+ m² (estimated)
Labeled Points 612.7 million
Raw Scan Data 2.3+ billion points
Point Density 6mm TLS resolution
Annotation Effort 754 person-hours
Facilities 13 type of water treatment facilities
Areas 13 areas
Rooms 20 unique rooms/scenes

Benchmark

Methods Evaluated

Fully-Supervised (6 methods):

  • KPConv
  • PosPool
  • RandLA-Net
  • ResPointNet++
  • PTv3 (Point Transformer V3)
  • Boundary-CB

Weakly-Supervised (1 method):

  • SQN (0.1% labels, 0.01% labels)

Unsupervised (1 method):

  • GrowSP

Foundation Models (1 method):

  • Point-SAM (Oracle, One-vs-Rest)

Key Results

Paradigm Method mIoU
Fully-Supervised Boundary-CB 55.74%
Fully-Supervised KPConv 53.65%
Fully-Supervised PosPool 53.18%
Fully-Supervised ResPointNet++ 52.48%
Fully-Supervised PTv3 41.90%
Fully-Supervised RandLA-Net 39.83%
Weakly-Supervised SQN (0.1% labels) 44.29%
Weakly-Supervised SQN (0.01% labels) 33.16%
Unsupervised GrowSP 11.73%
Foundation Model Point-SAM (Oracle) 21.08%
Foundation Model Point-SAM (One-vs-Rest) 15.79%

📚 Citation

@article{yin2026industrial3d,
  title={Industrial3D: A Terrestrial LiDAR Point Cloud Dataset and Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for Industrial Infrastructure},
  author={Yin, Chao and Yue, Hongzhe and Han, Qing and Hu, Difeng and Liang, Zhenyu and Lin, Fangzhou and Sun, Bing and Wang, Boyu and Li, Mingkai and Yao, Wei and Cheng, Jack C.P.},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28660},
  year={2026}
}

Related Work

@article{yin2021,
  title={Automated semantic segmentation of industrial point clouds using ResPointNet++},
  author={Yin, Chao and Wang, Boyu and Gan, Vincent JL and Wang, Mi and Cheng, Jack CP},
  journal={Automation in Construction},
  volume={130},
  pages={103874},
  year={2021},
  publisher={Elsevier},
  doi={10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103874}
}

@article{yin2023,
  title={Label-efficient semantic segmentation of large-scale industrial point clouds using weakly supervised learning},
  author={Yin, Chao and Yang, Bo and Cheng, Jack CP and Gan, Vincent JL and Wang, Boyu and Yang, Ji},
  journal={Automation in Construction},
  volume={148},
  pages={104757},
  year={2023},
  issn = {0926-5805},
  doi={10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104757},
}

@article{Yin2026arXiv,
  title={Resolving Primitive-Sharing Ambiguity in Long-Tailed Industrial Point Cloud Segmentation via Spatial Context Constraints},
  author={Yin, Chao and Han, Qing and Hou, Zhiwei and Liu, Yue and Dai, Anjin and Hu, Hongda and Yang, Ji and Yao, Wei},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.19128},
  eprint={2601.19128},
  year={2026}
}

About

Industrial3D: A Terrestrial LiDAR Point Cloud Dataset and Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for Industrial Infrastructure

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors