Skip to content

docs(changelog): record hook threshold centralization (PR #49)#50

Merged
Anthony Johnson II (AJ-EthereaLogic-ai) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/changelog-pr49
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

docs(changelog): record hook threshold centralization (PR #49)#50
Anthony Johnson II (AJ-EthereaLogic-ai) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/changelog-pr49

Conversation

@AJ-EthereaLogic-ai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Records the merged hook threshold-centralization refactor (PR #49) under [Unreleased] → Changed in CHANGELOG.md, keeping the tracking log in sync with main. Added to the existing Changed section (no duplicate heading).

Tests

  • markdownlint: 0 errors
  • Full suite: 38 passed / 0 failed

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 17, 2026 22:49
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@AJ-EthereaLogic-ai, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 57 minutes and 47 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6851ca55-bb51-4c77-90c7-46c7011d48a2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0562351 and b7b8a02.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/changelog-pr49

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@AJ-EthereaLogic-ai Anthony Johnson II (AJ-EthereaLogic-ai) merged commit 9296862 into main Jun 17, 2026
1 of 8 checks passed
@AJ-EthereaLogic-ai Anthony Johnson II (AJ-EthereaLogic-ai) deleted the docs/changelog-pr49 branch June 17, 2026 22:49

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The job was not started because the account is locked due to a billing issue.

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants