Skip to content

docs: correct source-grounding tags in the cross-chain stablecoin report - #67

Open
0xNeshi wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
missing-tags
Open

docs: correct source-grounding tags in the cross-chain stablecoin report#67
0xNeshi wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
missing-tags

Conversation

@0xNeshi

@0xNeshi 0xNeshi commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
  • New [LIBRARY] tag, matching the DEX and Lending reports: a reusable
    package in canton-contracts. Applied to the Access Control, Ownership
    Lifecycle, and Emergency Stop rows, which previously read [IMPLEMENTED].
  • -v1 suffixes on openzeppelin-access-control-v1, -ownable-v1, and
    -pausable-v1 throughout, so package names match their actual identifiers.
  • Fixed a stale commit hash: one canton-contracts link pointed at
    6d861f18… while the other nine, and the source-commit pinned in
    dars/manifest.yaml, use 68b7c52….
  • [IMPLEMENTED][EXPERIMENT] (24 occurrences) to match the shared
    legend used by the sibling reports.

Notably, §5.1's "1:1 reserve backing" and "Replay protection" are now
[FUTURE] — neither LockAttestation nor ConsumedNonceRegistry exists — and
§5.4 reasons entirely about the unbuilt nonce registry.

0xNeshi and others added 2 commits August 6, 2026 18:31
Rename [IMPLEMENTED] to [EXPERIMENT] across the cross-chain stablecoin
report (24 occurrences). The DEX, Lending, and Confidential Auction
reports already use [EXPERIMENT] for executable evidence in this
repository; [IMPLEMENTED] was this document's own coinage and matched no
tag in the shared legend.

Two divergences remain and are deliberately left for a follow-up: this
report's [EVIDENCE] is lending.md's [REFERENCE], and its [FUTURE] is
lending.md's [TARGET]. Renaming [FUTURE] would rewrite heading slugs that
are live link targets, so it is not a mechanical change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@0xNeshi 0xNeshi self-assigned this Aug 6, 2026

@pepebndc pepebndc left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants