Repository navigation
fix: republish source-aware Kaggle notebooks - #10
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 43 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (12)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary
Verification
./scripts/scan-secrets.shpython3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v(5 tests; exact cells executed)python3 scripts/generate_notebooks.py(clean worktree after regeneration)python3 scripts/package_kaggle.pypython3 -m compileall -q scripts testsruff check scripts testsruff format --check scripts testsjq emptyon both notebooksPublication status
The repository artifacts are ready. Public Kaggle republishing and an attached non-customer
OILPRICEAPI_KEYrequire private Kaggle credentials and remain tracked in #8; this PR intentionally does not claim that external publication is complete.Refs #8