Conversation
Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
|
/blossom-ci |
|
Hey @greptile this pr introduces nearly 400 binary files for numerical checkpoints and consistency, which might complicate git cloning. Got any suggestions for handling that? |
|
Here are a few approaches to handle those binary checkpoint files: 1. Git LFS (most common)
2. External storage with download script
3. Hybrid: essential vs full test suites
4. Programmatic generation
For PhysicsNeMo specifically, I'd suggest Git LFS + lazy loading in CI (option 1) since it:
What kind of files are these - numpy arrays, model weights, HDF5? |
Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
|
/blossom-ci |
… for compilation tests Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
|
/blossom-ci |
laserkelvin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In addition to my comment, the other question is whether you think we need coverage for the score_predictor path as well
Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
Right, I added tests for the |
|
/blossom-ci |
Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
|
/blossom-ci |
Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
|
/blossom-ci |
…modulus into diffusion-ci-tests
|
/blossom-ci |
Signed-off-by: Charlelie Laurent <claurent@nvidia.com>
|
/blossom-ci |
ktangsali
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes to Makefile look good. I am concerned about the 506 files though. Will this affect the clone speeds ? I guess this is inevitable in some sense
PhysicsNeMo Pull Request
Description
Checklist
Dependencies
Review Process
All PRs are reviewed by the PhysicsNeMo team before merging.
Depending on which files are changed, GitHub may automatically assign a maintainer for review.
We are also testing AI-based code review tools (e.g., Greptile), which may add automated comments with a confidence score.
This score reflects the AI’s assessment of merge readiness and is not a qualitative judgment of your work, nor is
it an indication that the PR will be accepted / rejected.
AI-generated feedback should be reviewed critically for usefulness.
You are not required to respond to every AI comment, but they are intended to help both authors and reviewers.
Please react to Greptile comments with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback on their accuracy.