Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
136 changes: 136 additions & 0 deletions library-skills/nvmolkit-usage/BENCHMARK.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
# Skill Benchmark: nvmolkit-usage

> ✅ **Overall verdict: PASS — Recommended for publication**

## Publication Recommendation

Recommended for publication based on the completed evaluation evidence in this report.

## Evaluation Metadata

- Skill: `nvmolkit-usage`
- Evaluation date: 2026-09-22
- Evaluator version: `1.5.6`
- Agents: Claude Code (`aws/anthropic/bedrock-claude-opus-4-8`), Codex (`openai/openai/gpt-5.5`)
- Tasks: 12 evaluation tasks (12 positive)
- Dataset digest: `sha256:ce8098e0dd2fc0698933b7d4d303fe13bdd1d9be7e87d142bdfc44baae7a9f90` (skill-evaluator-dataset-snapshot/1)
- Attempts per task: 3
- Environment: `k8s-sandbox`
- Tier 2 evidence: required for publication
- Tier 3 evidence: required for publication

Each task attempt ran in its own isolated sandbox pod.

## What This Report Answers

The three-tier evaluation checks whether the skill:

- is safe to use;
- produces correct answers;
- is discovered and activated when needed;
- helps the agent complete the user's goal and expected workflow; and
- avoids wasted skill and tool usage.

## Results at a Glance

| Measure | Claude Code (Baseline → Skill Uplift) | Codex (Baseline → Skill Uplift) |
|---|---:|---:|
| Overall | 91.1% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 92.3% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Security | 66.7% → 91.7% (+25.0 points) | 100.0% → 100.0% (±0.0 points) |
| Correctness | 95.0% → 100.0% (+5.0 points) | 96.7% → 96.7% (±0.0 points) |
| Discoverability | 91.7% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 95.0% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |
| Effectiveness | 91.4% → 92.6% (+1.2 points) | 82.9% → 85.4% (+2.5 points) |
| Efficiency | 79.5% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable | 84.6% — baseline ran, but no comparable score was available; uplift unavailable |

**How to read this table:** baseline is the same task attempted without the target skill. Scores are rounded to one decimal; threshold-adjacent values use additional precision so their displayed band matches the verdict. Uplift is derived from those displayed scores and shown in percentage points.

Example: `47.0% → 92.0% (+45.0 points)` means the skill-assisted run scored 92.0%, 45.0 percentage points above its 47.0% no-skill baseline.

## Token Usage

Actual Tier 3 execution usage is reported for every observed agent/case pair and both conditions.

| Agent | Dataset case | With skill | Without skill | Delta | Change | Coverage |
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---|
| claude-code | All cases | 6,493,519 | 7,705,207 | -1,211,688 | -15.73% | skill 12/12; base 12/12 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-001 | 155,960 | 499,586 | -343,626 | -68.78% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-002 | 1,444,045 | 251,086 | +1,192,959 | +475.12% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-003 | 360,067 | 1,104,712 | -744,645 | -67.41% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-004 | 397,086 | 997,159 | -600,073 | -60.18% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-005 | 1,032,516 | 813,303 | +219,213 | +26.95% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-006 | 201,515 | 899,766 | -698,251 | -77.60% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-007 | 354,878 | 826,660 | -471,782 | -57.07% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-008 | 1,120,265 | 332,364 | +787,901 | +237.06% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-009 | 68,769 | 328,077 | -259,308 | -79.04% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-010 | 587,346 | 1,087,974 | -500,628 | -46.01% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-011 | 69,433 | 62,607 | +6,826 | +10.90% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| claude-code | nvmolkit-usage-012 | 701,639 | 501,913 | +199,726 | +39.79% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | All cases | 943,466 | 734,327 | +209,139 | +28.48% | skill 12/12; base 12/12 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-001 | 42,367 | 42,161 | +206 | +0.49% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-002 | 41,746 | 56,617 | -14,871 | -26.27% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-003 | 74,002 | 77,309 | -3,307 | -4.28% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-004 | 93,170 | 35,798 | +57,372 | +160.27% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-005 | 132,697 | 34,827 | +97,870 | +281.02% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-006 | 94,449 | 28,675 | +65,774 | +229.38% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-007 | 71,719 | 64,534 | +7,185 | +11.13% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-008 | 142,524 | 89,073 | +53,451 | +60.01% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-009 | 30,802 | 20,599 | +10,203 | +49.53% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-010 | 118,378 | 29,444 | +88,934 | +302.04% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-011 | 30,667 | 18,603 | +12,064 | +64.85% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| codex | nvmolkit-usage-012 | 70,945 | 236,687 | -165,742 | -70.03% | skill 1/1; base 1/1 |
| ALL AGENTS | Dataset aggregate | 7,436,985 | 8,439,534 | -1,002,549 | -11.88% | skill 24/24; base 24/24 |

Prompt tokens include cached reads, so total tokens are `prompt + completion` (cached is not added twice). The Efficiency score uses `(prompt - cached) + completion`. N/A means the relevant trajectory counters were not available; coverage is never estimated.

## Tier Status

| Tier | Purpose | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Static validation | **PASSED WITH OBSERVATIONS** | 11 validator(s); 1 finding(s) |
| Tier 2 | Semantic deduplication | **PASSED** | 2 validator(s); 0 finding(s) |
| Tier 3 | Live agent evaluation | **PASS** | 2 agent(s); 12 task(s) |

## Findings and Observations

<details>
<summary>Show detailed findings and successful checks</summary>

- **LOW** SCHEMA/author_format: Author must be of the form 'Name <email@host>' (`skills/nvmolkit-usage/SKILL.md`)

</details>

## Scoring Methodology

<details>
<summary>Show dimension definitions, source signals, and thresholds</summary>

| Dimension | Question | Scored signals |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Is it safe to use? | `security` (100%) |
| Correctness | Is the answer correct? | `accuracy` (100%) |
| Discoverability | Was the right skill loaded when needed? | `skill_execution` (100%) |
| Effectiveness | Did the skill help complete the task? | `goal_accuracy` (50%) + `behavior_check` (50%) |
| Efficiency | Did it avoid wasted tool calls and token usage? | `skill_efficiency` (50%) + `token_efficiency` (50%) |

- Dimension bands: PASS at 50% or above; NEUTRAL from 40% to below 50%; FAIL below 40%.
- Overall Tier 3 lift: PASS at +5 points or more; FAIL at -10 points or less; values between those bands are NEUTRAL.
- Overall verdict: PASS only when every configured dimension passes for at least one supported agent. Lift is reported as diagnostic evidence and does not override this gate.
- The 50% attempt pass threshold is a separate per-task gate; it is not the dimension pass threshold.
- Effectiveness is the equal-weight mean of goal completion (`goal_accuracy`) and expected workflow adherence (`behavior_check`).
- Efficiency is 50% tool-call productivity (the backward-compatible `skill_efficiency` wire id) and 50% `token_efficiency`. Positive-case skill routing is scored under Discoverability, not Efficiency; a negative case without a routing target is N/A. N/A sources are omitted, remaining weights are renormalized, and the dimension is marked partial.

Signals present in this run:

- `security` (Security): unsafe operations, secret leakage, and unauthorized access.
- `skill_execution` (Skill Execution): whether the expected skill was selected, decoys were avoided, and the workflow executed.
- `skill_efficiency` (Tool Productivity): tool-call productivity (legacy wire id; routing is scored under Discoverability).
- `accuracy` (Accuracy): final-answer correctness against the reference answer.
- `goal_accuracy` (Goal Accuracy): whether the user's goal was achieved.
- `behavior_check` (Behavior Check): whether the expected workflow behavior was followed.
- `token_efficiency` (Token Efficiency): actual uncached prompt plus completion usage (50% of Efficiency).

</details>

## Freshness

Regenerate this benchmark when the skill, evaluation dataset, target agent/model, evaluator version, environment, or scoring policy changes.
Loading