Conversation
# Conflicts: # environments/py-3.12-linux-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.12-linux-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.12-win-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.12-win-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.13-linux-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.13-linux-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.13-win-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.13-win-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.14-linux-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.14-linux-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.14-win-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.14-win-64.conda.lock.yml # py-3.12.conda-lock.yml # py-3.13.conda-lock.yml # py-3.14.conda-lock.yml
MatthieuCMira
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I might not be the best to review english.
Maybe run a colpilote review?
Some links are 404 errors.
And Some figures are old analyst. As you are changing the file, maybe you could retake thge screenshots?
Moreover, there is an error in the github tests.
As you changed the toml file, would be nice to fix it
Co-authored-by: MatthieuCMira <109624972+MatthieuCMira@users.noreply.github.com>
# Conflicts: # environments/py-3.12-linux-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.12-linux-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.12-win-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.12-win-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.13-linux-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.13-linux-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.13-win-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.13-win-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.14-linux-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.14-linux-64.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.14-win-64-dev.conda.lock.yml # environments/py-3.14-win-64.conda.lock.yml # py-3.12.conda-lock.yml # py-3.13.conda-lock.yml # py-3.14.conda-lock.yml
benk-mira
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking good overall. Couple suggestions/questions.
|
|
||
| 1. **Parameter retrieval**: The application reads the conductor geometry (strike length, dip length, width, dip angle, conductivity) from the ui.json metadata stored in the simulation file. | ||
|
|
||
| 2. **Spatial positioning**: The application positions the plate at the centroid of the matched survey segment, adjusted vertically by the overburden thickness. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this right? Why not position it based on the depth of the matched plate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because that's the reference of a Maxwell plate (center top of the plate). Our reference center for Plate is at the center of mass (xyz center), which requires some trig to compensate for the dip angle.
docs/plate-simulation/sweep.rst
Outdated
|
|
||
| .. figure:: /plate-simulation/images/sweep_landing.png | ||
| :align: center | ||
| :width: 80% |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| :width: 80% | |
| :width: 50% |
docs/plate-simulation/sweep.rst
Outdated
|
|
||
| .. figure:: /plate-simulation/images/summary.png | ||
| :align: center | ||
| :width: 60% |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| :width: 60% | |
| :width: 80% |
Co-authored-by: benk-mira <81254271+benk-mira@users.noreply.github.com>
No description provided.