Sharp axial geometry for the full birth-time law: necessity beyond the union bound - #736
Draft
LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Sharp axial geometry for the full birth-time law: necessity beyond the union bound#736LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
… convergence Add the missing necessity via fixed-subcritical RSW rings and independent bands. Separate full-law consistency from balance-root consistency; no oblique necessity, new pc, or novelty claim. Exact finite controls and three local tests executed; full repository CI not run.
LightChainr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2026
…ocation Keep one active acceptance package on #735, incorporating the #613/#736 axial full-law boundary. Source-visible state is a visible reserve, not a second active dispatch. Preserve the newer #650 focus instead of overwriting it. Oblique full-law necessity is an optional strengthening, not a new prerequisite. Documentation and allocation JSON only; no research or experimental changes.
LightChainr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2026
…ull-law criterion Add orientation-uniform staircase crossings with explicit periodic closure and finite-group translation packing. This proves log N / ell -> 0 is necessary and sufficient for the whole birth law on arbitrary honest integer-period tori, while consolidating #735's weaker geometry for balance-root consistency. Five additive files; five local tests and 135168 finite configurations checked. No full repository CI or publication novelty claim. No existing research asset or navigation file modified. Refs #613 #735 #736 #650.
This was referenced Sep 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Result delivered, not a new enumeration assignment
For honest axial square-site tori with
2 <= w_n <= m_nandw_n*m_n -> infinity, under the explicitly cited critical square-site RSW, site sharpness and matching-duality inputs,The new part is necessity, including logarithmic-width sequences. An upper union bound failing to vanish was never a proof of necessity. Here a seam-closed ring of crossing events has probability at least
exp(-eta*w)at a FIXEDp_eta < p_c; independent vertex-disjoint transverse bands amplify it. This forcesP0 -> 0and keeps each fixed lower quantile away fromp_con a witnessing subsequence. The median/balance root is deliberately NOT included in that obstruction.This complements #718/#735: on
m=ceil(exp(d*w)),w -> infinitystill suffices for the balance root, but not for the full law. No new numericalp_c, exponent, or continuum identification. No necessity theorem for arbitrary oblique periods. The missing uniform oblique-corridor lemma is stated precisely as the next question.Files and validation
notes/axial-quantile-geometry-criterion-20260913.md: proof, quantifier order, source reading boundaries and prior-art caveat.scripts/axial_ring_gluing.py: free-rectangle crossing BFS versus an independent lifted-graph winding detector.tests/test_axial_ring_gluing.py: 3 mathematical tests, passed locally.results/research-control-20260913/axial-ring-controls.json: 21,760 exhaustive configurations, 2,365 deterministic uneven-cell controls, zero implication failures; exact Fraction FKG checks at 1/3, 1/2, 2/3.At 4x2 the sufficient ring event has 17 configurations, while winding has 35: the construction is explicitly not an event identity. Controls do not prove RSW or the all-size theorem.
Python compilation passed. Full repository CI not run by this delivery. No existing code, production data, frozen design or old result is replaced. Independent all-size proof review and systematic novelty comparison remain publication work. This proof is supplied as a consequence of named inputs, not as a claim to have invented RSW/strip gluing.
Owner-delegated research redirection on 2026-09-13. Advances #613; #276 stays completed. Related #716/#718/#735 and #650.