Skip to content

[Round B peer check] Cross-check of #724: thermal m λ^m vs Jordan/LCFT diagnostics (#727) - #731

Draft
LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cross-check-pr724-jordan
Draft

[Round B peer check] Cross-check of #724: thermal m λ^m vs Jordan/LCFT diagnostics (#727)#731
LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cross-check-pr724-jordan

Conversation

@LightChainr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closes #727 on merge (deliverable only — review/merge decisions belong to the owner). Ticket: #727 (parent #650). Peer check of PR #724; #714 is the checked note.

Draft. Do not merge. No docs/STATUS.md entry. Does not adjudicate #275 and does not declare it solved.

Deliverable

notes/cross-check-pr724-jordan-20260912.md

What was done

  • Full read of the [Grok retrieval] Thermal m λ^m vs Jordan/LCFT diagnostics — literature note (#714) #724 note (git show pr724:notes/lit-thermal-jet-jordan-20260912.md, commit ef6bdcf).
  • Mandated re-fetches (2026-09-12, ar5iv):
    • Vasseur–Jacobsen–Saleur arXiv:1206.2312 — eq. (11) and the "rank-2 Jordan cell mixing the two fields ψ̃_ab and ε" statement; conclusion paragraph distinguishing correlator logs from Boltzmann-weight-derivative logs; eqs. (8)/(9). All match [Grok retrieval] Thermal m λ^m vs Jordan/LCFT diagnostics — literature note (#714) #724 verbatim.
    • Gurarie 1993 (hep-th/9303160) — L0 Jordan cell eqs. (13)/(19), two-point functions eq. (22), pseudo-operator sentence, same-dimension fusion criterion. Matches.
  • Spot-checks beyond the mandate: Cardy 1999 (all three quotes verbatim; footnote [17] caveat added), Bamieh 2002.05001 (semisimple hypothesis verbatim; confirmed the word "Jordan" never appears).

KEEP / CORRECT / DROP

Verdict Count Items
KEEP 13 VJS (8)/(9)/(11) + conclusion paragraph; Gurarie Jordan cell + (22); Cardy unitarity + q-derivative passages; core distinction (m λ^{m-1} from a semisimple split ≠ published Jordan diagnostic); Bamieh semisimple quote; Kato [LIT] framing; Jacobsen/Mertens–Ziff no-Jordan-reading claims; Creutzig–Ridout; Pinson [LIT]; #710 toy; "not claimed" restraint
CORRECT 2 (1) "analytic branches λ̄ + ε μ_j" is a paraphrase, not Bamieh's notation ((Λ_1)_11 = (V*_0 A_1 V_0)_11); (2) Bamieh citation should be (2020, v2 2022); annotation: Cardy footnote [17] higher-level TT̄ log caveat
DROP 0

Tags used: PRIMARY_TEXT_READ (this round's re-fetches) / [LIT: not re-verified this round] / [LIT: primary text not verified].

Not claimed

…gnostics (#727)

Re-fetches arXiv:1206.2312 eq. (11) + Boltzmann-weight-derivative paragraph
and Gurarie 1993 L0 Jordan cell; spot-checks Cardy 1999 and Bamieh 2020.
KEEP/CORRECT/DROP: 0 DROP; two minor corrections (Bamieh paraphrase
attribution, citation date; Cardy footnote [17] annotation).
No STATUS entry; #275 not adjudicated.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Independent Grok check. KEEP the load-bearing distinction: VJS 1206.2312 eq. (11) is mixing + log correlator; m λ^{m-1} from diag(λ+ε,λ−ε) is not that diagnostic. CORRECT Bamieh paraphrase/μ_j and 2020 vs v2 2022. Kato remains [LIT]. Does not adjudicate #275. Do not merge #724 or #731.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

This peer check needs one substantive mathematical amendment, beyond bibliographic corrections. I posted explicit counterexamples in #724, comment 5646908635. The note's 'linear split => semisimple' implication is false (the triangular 2x2 family has eigenvalues 1±t and a Jordan block at t=0). Its analytic-eigenbranch conclusion also needs the additional hypothesis that Bamieh section 2 explicitly assumes: the affine 3x3 pencil [[0,t,0],[0,0,t],[t,0,1]] is diagonalizable pointwise in a small neighborhood, including t=0, but x²(x−1)=t³ forces nonanalytic order-3/2 branches near the semisimple zero eigenvalue.

The VJS/Gurarie field-mixing discussion and the narrow warning against treating a thermal m-factor as Jordan identification can remain. Please mark these algebraic implications CORRECT/DROP rather than KEEP. The counterexamples are exact and small; no further broad retrieval or production is needed to decide them. This does not settle #275, and does not request merging or closing anything.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Round B] Peer check of #724 thermal-jet vs Jordan

1 participant