Skip to content

[P1 proof] #679: r_b + r_w = 2 on every honest square-cell torus — the #271 theorem, scope separated (notes only) - #691

Draft
LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ticket-679-digital-alexander-rank-sum
Draft

[P1 proof] #679: r_b + r_w = 2 on every honest square-cell torus — the #271 theorem, scope separated (notes only)#691
LightChainr wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ticket-679-digital-alexander-rank-sum

Conversation

@LightChainr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Deliverable for #679 (parent #650). Notes only — no STATUS edit, no merge, closes nothing.

Verdict

Yes — r_NN + r_NN+NNN = 2 is a theorem, configurationwise, on every honest square-cell torus. Proved in PR #271 (notes/digital-alexander-duality-proof.md, merged 2026-08-29). The site L=3,4 and bond L=3 census rows are finite checks of it, not its evidence base. It is not a small-L census fact.

What the note delivers (one new file: notes/digital-alexander-rank-sum-scope-20260908.md)

  1. Honest hypothesis made precise. ell_N > sqrt(2) iff all four corners of every unit cell remain distinct (the inter-corner difference set is exactly the eight vectors of length ≤ √2). Axis L×L honest iff L ≥ 2.
  2. (a) Local, separated: the 16-pattern facewise certificate (PR Prove the digital Alexander rank bridge #271) says only that the 4/8 digital matching complement has the correct image in H₁(S) — retained diagonals exactly on the two opposite-white-pair patterns, boundary-path replacements for the six redundant ones, no crossing diagonals retained. Purely local; no ranks, no "2". Re-ran the committed certificate on 2026-09-08: 16/16 pass, zero replacement failures, bit-identical to results/digital-alexander-local-bridge/latest.json.
  3. (b) Global bridge, one explicit sentence: r_NN = rank A (U retracts to G_B), r_NN+NNN = rank C by (a), C = A^perp by the complementary-subsurface duality lemma, dim H₁(T²;Q) = 2, hence the sum. The local statement alone constrains the two images; the global lemma fixes their sum; on a genus-g surface the same local certificate would give rank A + rank C = 2g.
  4. Bond ≠ site. The probe635: M(p) as both-same sector difference — exact at finite L (verdict A, degenerate sectors); #628 bond rank defect fixed #646/Repair #632 bond laboratory; wrapping-type census L=3,4 (#640) #653 bond L=3 identity is duality-oddness under the transport involution T (self-matching square-bond torus); square-site is not self-matching (M_L(1/2) = −21/64 at L=3) and admits no such involution. Neither direction imports.
  5. Scope ([Grok / proof] Verify #276's critical-point bridge for all fixed threshold quantiles #613 item 4 convention): repository lemma, not a new theorem. Duncan–Kahle–Schweinhart holds the giant-cycle framework but neither states nor needs this identity; van den Berg caveat irrelevant to a configurationwise deterministic statement; no p_c lever pulled.
  6. Effect on PR Rewrite the #635 identity after #668: both-same is not rank-2 (#672) #676 Conjecture 3.2: the structural half (no (0,0)/(2,2) cells, rank-sum at every L) is the Prove the digital Alexander rank bridge #271 theorem on honest tori and travels to every honest L. The per-L wrap-cell support / spiral-cancellation counts remain genuinely conjectural — the rank theorem does not see wrap-cell counts.
  7. Degenerate quotients: ell_N ≤ sqrt(2) (47 of 140 HNF representatives through index 13) excluded by hypothesis, not refuted; frontier oracle has zero rank-sum failures through index 13, quoted as evidence with provenance.

Constraints honored

Notes/proof only. No Monte Carlo. No new census (only re-ran the committed PR #271 certificate against its committed manifest — deterministic, sub-second). No Huawei. No STATUS edit. Does not close #613/#632/#668/#679. Draft against main.

Related: #613, #632, #650, #668, #679; PRs #271, #646, #653, #670, #676.

…st tori, census rows are checks

One notes file: notes/digital-alexander-rank-sum-scope-20260908.md.
Separates the local 16-pattern complementary-neighbourhood certificate
(PR #271, rerun clean 2026-09-08) from the global complementary-subsurface
duality lemma; makes the (a)->(b) bridge explicit. Bond (#646/#653
duality-oddness) explicitly not imported as the site theorem.
Degenerate quotients (ell_N <= sqrt(2)) excluded, frontier status quoted.
Verdict per #613 item 4: repository lemma, not a new theorem. Effect on
PR #676 Conjecture 3.2: structural half travels to every honest L;
per-L wrap-cell support stays conjectural.

No Monte Carlo, no new census, no STATUS edit, closes nothing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Verification comment, not a merge request. Ticket stays open.

Notes-only, no new census, no STATUS. The useful split is the one the ticket asked for: the 16-pattern certificate is local (images, not the number 2); r_b+r_w=2 is global (complementary-subsurface duality + dim H_1(T^2)=2), already in merged PR #271. Site L=3,4 / bond L=3 rows are checks. Bond duality-oddness does not import to site. Honest hypothesis ell_N > √2 is stated; degenerate quotients excluded not refuted.

Consequence for #676 Conjecture 3.2: the rank-sum half travels to every honest L; wrap-cell support / spiral counts still do not.

I did not re-run the 16-pattern certificate in this pass. Do not close #679 / #613 / #668.

@LightChainr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Grok verify (independent of the CLI self-check). Not a merge. Ticket stays open.

Tripwire vs #679:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Grok / proof] Verify #276's critical-point bridge for all fixed threshold quantiles

1 participant