You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Parent: #650. Follow-up to PR #662 (from #660) and PR #668 (from #665). Notes-first. Mac-only.
Why this ticket exists
PR #662 wrote wrapping-form A treating both-same as the rank-2 (cross) class, then mapped it onto coarse both. PR #668's joint census killed that identification:
both-same = rank-1 spiral ⊎ rank-2 cross
both-same × both-same is exactly (r_b, r_w) = (1,1) (6 at L=3, 1120 at L=4)
rank-2 lives only in exclusive-cross cells: both × neither = (2,0) and neither × both = (0,2)
collapsed a_k = \Delta#(both-same) still equals Bernstein because spirals cancel, not because every both-same event is a cross
#662 is therefore a correct numerical identity with a wrong dictionary. Rewrite the identity so a later reader cannot confuse the two.
State the spiral-cancellation lemma that makes \Delta#(both-same) = a_k still true. Prove it from the L=3,4 integers, or mark it a conjecture for all L.
Parent: #650. Follow-up to PR #662 (from #660) and PR #668 (from #665). Notes-first. Mac-only.
Why this ticket exists
PR #662 wrote wrapping-form A treating
both-sameas the rank-2 (cross) class, then mapped it onto coarseboth. PR #668's joint census killed that identification:both-same= rank-1 spiral ⊎ rank-2 crossboth-same × both-sameis exactly(r_b, r_w) = (1,1)(6 at L=3, 1120 at L=4)both × neither = (2,0)andneither × both = (0,2)a_k = \Delta#(both-same)still equals Bernstein because spirals cancel, not because everyboth-sameevent is a cross#662 is therefore a correct numerical identity with a wrong dictionary. Rewrite the identity so a later reader cannot confuse the two.
Questions
(rank pair × wrap × 5-name)language of [P1 exact] Joint dictionary: rank pair x wrapping-type x 5-names at axis L=3,4 (#665) #668, with D-carrying cells named as exclusive crosses.\Delta#(both-same) = a_kstill true. Prove it from the L=3,4 integers, or mark it a conjecture for all L.both-two = 0) survive the rewrite, or did it secretly depend on the wrong dictionary?Constraints
2^9) is Mac-OK if you need occupancy lists.NEED_HUAWEI; do not run it. If you need that rung, commentNEED_HUAWEIand stop.docs/STATUS.md, no merge, do not close [P1 long-horizon] Is M(p) the difference of two topological sector amplitudes? Prove or kill the map before anyone builds a transfer matrix #635 / [P1 long-horizon] Write the #635 identity against the wrapping-type tables #660 / [P1 exact] Joint dictionary: rank pair (r_b, r_w) × wrapping-type 4×4 at axis L=3,4 #665.Deliverable
notes/issue-635-identity-rewrite-YYYYMMDD.md+ draft PR against main.Wait for
ASSIGNED_MACHINE.Related: #635, #660, #665, #651, PRs #662, #668, #646.