Skip to content

[P2 reanalysis] Compatible g-lift vs exact-lab ΔZ after the #633/#653 repairs #661

Description

@LightChainr

Parent: #650. Leftover of #633, not a new production and not a second #622.

Why this is a separate ticket

#633 restored spin-0 N725 Q/Z (PR #655) and retracted 159.6° → 20.4° unoriented on the tiny-torus g vs ΔZ reading. It left N725 g-versus-ΔZ undetermined (no second production size).

#632/#653 repaired the exact laboratory (dual_fail=0 on site; do not copy PR #628's broken bond Z).

The comparison #633 asked for can now be done on existing objects:

DZ_Q[g](u) = (g(u)−g(a))/W − (Q(u)−Q(a))(g(b)−g(a))/W²
W = Q(b)−Q(a)

Default shared anchors 0.2 and 0.8 (both exist on g's 9-decile grid). 1/4 and 3/4 only as a labelled sensitivity if you interpolate g. Compare unoriented lines (|cosine|). Tiny-torus ΔZ cannot prove an asymptotic mismatch — say so if that is still all you have.

Assets (unmerged; fetch branches)

Do not rerun N725. Do not become #622 (no new S theory). One comparison, one notes file.

Deliverable

notes/issue-633-glift-exact-lab-YYYYMMDD.md + JSON of the angles/vectors. Draft PR against main. Equal weighting is sensitivity, not a second vote.

If an anchor or covariance is missing, leave the angle undetermined. Do not invent a conclusion to fill the ticket.

No STATUS, no merge, do not close #633/#622. Wait for ASSIGNED_MACHINE.

Related: #633, #632, #653, #655, #622.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    priority:P2Deferred research or on-demand support; no default new compute allocation.

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions