Repository navigation
Fix municipal service-code semantics - #89
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Vitor Mattos <1079143+vitormattos@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #88.
The previous contract fix correctly enforced 9 digits but incorrectly described the value as NBS.
Official NFS-e municipal-panel documentation defines the municipal-parameters service code as:
000when there is no municipal subdivision.This PR keeps the 9-digit validation, fixes the semantics/documentation, and updates tests to use
010101000.