fixing minor spelling mistake

[Eiernase]

Pacakge

[marcelfolaron]

Maintainer review (advisory — merge authority stays with @marcelfolaron / @broskees)

Intent: Fixes the Pacakge → Package spelling in the bullet describing package-based installation in installation/system-requirements.md.

Change requests: None — the single-line diff is correct and scoped.

• installation/system-requirements.md:5 — Package based installation reads correctly. ✔

Note: this is the oldest open PR in this repo (opened 2025-07-28, ~344 days) and is trivially safe; recommend prioritizing it to clear the backlog.

Acceptance checklist (must pass before merge):

1. CLA signed / green (first-time contributor).
2. Rendered docs page shows the corrected word with no Markdown breakage.
3. N/A — no schema/API/behavior change (docs typo only).

CI status: No CI test gate applies to a docs typo; only the CLA/first-time-contributor check is relevant. Not a blocker beyond CLA.

[marcelfolaron]

Maintainer review — status: ready (advisory) · priority: P3 · next action: maintainer merge · owner: @marcelfolaron

Thanks for the fix, and apologies this sat so long — this is the oldest open PR in the repo (opened 2025-07-28).

1. Intent: Corrects the spelling of "Pacakge" → "Package" in installation/system-requirements.md.

2. Change requests: None. The one-line diff at installation/system-requirements.md:5 is correct and self-contained:

-- **Pacakge based installation** requires a Linux Distribution, preferably Ubuntu 20.04+.
+- **Package based installation** requires a Linux Distribution, preferably Ubuntu 20.04+.

3. Acceptance checklist (must pass before merge):

• Docs build/link-check CI green (or, if docs has no CI, a maintainer eyeballs the rendered page)
• No behavior change — docs-only, so no test required
• Confirm this doesn't conflict with fixed install links #51 (which also edits installation/) — different file, so should be clean

4. CI status: I can't read check-run status through my current tooling this cycle, so please confirm CI is green in the GitHub UI before merging. No behavior change and no tests are needed for a docs typo, so the missing-tests-is-a-blocker rule does not apply here.

Advisory review only — not an approval. Merge authority stays with @marcelfolaron / @broskees.