[cristim]

Trim the payment value in the handleExecutePurchase guard added by #643 so a whitespace-only payment is refused like an empty one, and add a jest case for it.

Follow-up from the #643 review; no linked issue.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Whitespace-only payment options are now rejected before purchase submission.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository: LeanerCloud/cloud-commitments-platform/.coderabbit.yaml
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Essentials
• Run ID: a60599db-0983-4316-8698-aa2127580e96

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df036ad and c32a28a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• frontend/src/__tests__/purchase-execution-toast.test.ts
• frontend/src/app.ts

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. 0 included reviews remain after this review. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 1 review per hour.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Purchase execution now rejects payment values that contain only whitespace. The refusal test includes a whitespace-only payment value.

Changes

Purchase payment validation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Payment option validation frontend/src/app.ts, frontend/src/__tests__/purchase-execution-toast.test.ts	The payment-option check tests the trimmed value. The refusal test includes a whitespace-only value.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to c32a2

The whitespace-only payment case is rejected before purchase submission, and the focused test verifies that behavior. No identified issue blocks merging.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the main change: whitespace-only payment values are treated as missing during purchase execution.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 2 files.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}