Currently, the Readme (especially the folder example) does not reflect the state of the folders. (For example src should contain papers). Also sometimes the used names are not concise (for example features [!== features in development but rather features for machine learning models]).
Also, an example of the workflow would be helpful.
Currently, the Readme (especially the folder example) does not reflect the state of the folders. (For example
srcshould contain papers). Also sometimes the used names are not concise (for example features [!== features in development but rather features for machine learning models]).Also, an example of the workflow would be helpful.