chore: rewrite test doc comment

[JohnVerheij]

The XML doc comment on Quaternion_HasAxisAngleApproximately_ExtractedAxisOppositeExpected_AlignsForDisplay
used an interrupting parenthetical that broke the sentence flow. Rewrite
as two clean sentences without the parenthetical.

Test-only change. No behaviour or public-surface impact.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated internal test documentation for clarity.

---

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes. Updates were made solely to test documentation.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5d6c5560-fc2d-4cbc-b1e9-1d21e5b37a4a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3e7e7e and c4a3ef7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/MathAssertions.TUnit.Tests/FailureMessageRenderingTests.cs

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates the XML documentation comment for the Quaternion_HasAxisAngleApproximately_ExtractedAxisOppositeExpected_AlignsForDisplay test method. The rewording clarifies the sign-correction behavior and how test inputs drive the failure renderer output. No test logic, assertions, or public API changes are present.

Changes

Test Documentation Update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Quaternion test failure renderer documentation tests/MathAssertions.TUnit.Tests/FailureMessageRenderingTests.cs	XML documentation comment reworded to clarify sign-correction behavior and how test inputs drive the failure message rendering path.

Estimated Code Review Effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A comment rewoven with care,
The quaternion's twist laid bare—
Tests speak true when docs align,
Sign and axis, crystal-fine! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and accurately describes the main change: updating XML documentation for a test method.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/scrub-test-em-dash

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!