Repository navigation
Add a reproducible FluentAI workflow demo and MIT license - #3
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a current-app lesson screenshot and short video near the top of the README so reviewers can inspect FluentAI's lesson-to-review-to-conversation flow. The recording drives the actual browser renderer and Python bridge using a disposable profile and an explicitly labelled mocked provider. A deliberate quiz mistake produces feedback and spaced review; progress survives reload. Include recording scripts, concise reproduction steps, and source/check metadata.
Add an MIT license for Johan Vaz's original work, preserving third-party terms. Ordinary app entrypoints remain API-key-first; the recording makes no live model, voice/camera, or signed-distribution claim.
Validation: 133 Python tests without skips, 11 renderer scenarios, JS/redaction checks, mocked smoke, Ruff, and recorder syntax/link checks. The browser run asserts a 5/6 quiz result, XP/review updates, persistence after reload, and no browser/bridge errors; external requests are blocked. H.264 video and screenshot visually reviewed. No personal learner state or paid API calls used.