T36 data format v2

[jgroehl]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 37.50% and project coverage change: -8.55 ⚠️

Comparison is base (4dee0db) 89.46% compared to head (389f428) 80.92%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #37      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.46%   80.92%   -8.55%     
==========================================
  Files          19       20       +1     
  Lines         997     1195     +198     
==========================================
+ Hits          892      967      +75     
- Misses        105      228     +123     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytests	80.92% <37.50%> (-8.55%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pacfish/qualitycontrol/PADataIntegrityCheck.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
pacfish/api/adapters/Imagio_File_Converter.py	27.67% <27.67%> (ø)
pacfish/qualitycontrol/ConsistencyChecker.py	91.86% <57.14%> (-3.55%)	⬇️
pacfish/iohandler/file_reader.py	87.23% <75.00%> (-6.32%)	⬇️
pacfish/api/BaseAdapter.py	92.10% <100.00%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
pacfish/api/adapters/Nrrd_File_Converter.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pacfish/api/adapters/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pacfish/core/Metadata.py	99.46% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pacfish/iohandler/file_writer.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[jgroehl]

@amasmiller is there any chance to still test if the proposed changes to the data format will work for you?
It is a minor change that re-defined the definition of "frame", where a list of wavelengths is now kept separately.