🧪 [testing improvement] Add tests for useYearInReview hook

[is0692vs]

🎯 What: Added missing unit tests for the useYearInReview hook in src/hooks/__tests__/useDashboardData.test.ts.
📊 Coverage: The tests now cover:

• Loading state handling
• Unauthenticated user state
• Authenticated user without a valid token
• Invalid year parameter (NaN or null)
• Successful data fetch with a valid token and year
• SWR loading and error state handling
  ✨ Result: Ensures the useYearInReview hook behaves correctly under various conditions, improving the overall reliability and test coverage of the useDashboardData.ts file.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 6257324372230496062 started by @is0692vs

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
github-user-summary	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 21, 2026 5:51am

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@is0692vs has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 21 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 76dda89d-bb4e-4c04-b135-1ebfa2131f57

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87d145d and c865b71.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/hooks/__tests__/useDashboardData.test.ts

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch jules-testing-improvement-useYearInReview-6257324372230496062

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the robustness of the application by introducing a comprehensive suite of unit tests for the useYearInReview hook. These tests validate the hook's behavior across various authentication statuses, data fetching states, and input validations, ensuring its stability and correctness in different operational contexts.

Highlights

• New Unit Tests: Added comprehensive unit tests for the useYearInReview hook, which was previously lacking dedicated test coverage.
• Improved Coverage: The new tests cover critical scenarios including loading states, unauthenticated and authenticated (with/without token) user states, invalid year parameter handling (NaN, null), successful data fetching, and SWR's loading and error states.
• Enhanced Reliability: Ensures the useYearInReview hook functions correctly under diverse conditions, thereby improving the overall reliability and test coverage of the useDashboardData.ts file.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

The pull request introduces comprehensive unit tests for the new useYearInReview hook in src/hooks/__tests__/useDashboardData.test.ts. These tests cover various scenarios including loading states, authenticated and unauthenticated user sessions, handling of invalid or null year inputs, successful data fetching, and SWR error and loading states.

[is0692vs]

レビュー内容を整理します。

全体所感

• gemini-code-assist: The pull request introduces comprehensive unit tests for the new useYearInReview hook in src/hooks/ tests /useDashboardData.test.ts. These tests cover various scenarios including loading states, authenticated and unauthenticated user sessions, handling of invalid or null year...

• 現時点で未解決のインライン指摘は見当たりませんでした。

[google-labs-jules]

レビュー内容を整理します。

全体所感

• gemini-code-assist: The pull request introduces comprehensive unit tests for the new useYearInReview hook in src/hooks/ tests /useDashboardData.test.ts. These tests cover various scenarios including loading states, authenticated and unauthenticated user sessions, handling of invalid or null year...

• 現時点で未解決のインライン指摘は見当たりませんでした。

了解しました。未解決の指摘事項がないことを確認いたしました。PRは完了となります。

[is0692vs]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[is0692vs]

Resolved through consolidation in meta/final-consolidated and merged to main.

[google-labs-jules]

Resolved through consolidation in meta/final-consolidated and merged to main.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work was merged via a consolidated PR.