Skip to content

🧪 Testing improvement: Complete test coverage for useDashboardData with SWRConfig#103

Merged
is0692vs merged 3 commits intomainfrom
jules-14916218358757885008-cb2af12f
Mar 21, 2026
Merged

🧪 Testing improvement: Complete test coverage for useDashboardData with SWRConfig#103
is0692vs merged 3 commits intomainfrom
jules-14916218358757885008-cb2af12f

Conversation

@is0692vs
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request addresses the testing gap for the useDashboardData hook and its related hooks (useYearInReview, useDashboardStats).

🎯 What:

The testing gap addressed was that useDashboardData.ts lacked proper integration and unit testing that utilized SWR's native caching mechanisms correctly. Specifically, the hooks needed to be wrapped in a SessionProvider mock and an SWRConfig mock to properly simulate UI state without resorting to brittle SWR module-level mocks.

📊 Coverage:

The following scenarios are now fully tested across all exported functions in src/hooks/useDashboardData.ts:

  • Unauthenticated State: Hooks correctly return { isLoading: false } and avoid fetching data.
  • Authenticated without Token: Hooks correctly avoid fetching data when authentication token is absent.
  • Authenticated with valid Parameters: Hooks correctly construct the API query path, execute fetch, and return the parsed data and standard UI state.
  • Error Conditions: Hooks correctly handle HTTP 500, HTTP 404, empty bodies, and general networking failures via the fetcher logic.

Result:

Test coverage for src/hooks/useDashboardData.ts is now at 100% (Statements, Branches, Functions, Lines). Tests are robust and deterministically isolate state using <SWRConfig provider={() => new Map()} />. The redundant top-level useDashboardData.test.ts has been removed, centralizing the robust tests in the src/hooks/__tests__ directory as .test.tsx to fully support JSX test wrappers.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 14916218358757885008 started by @is0692vs

…rapper

Co-authored-by: is0692vs <135803462+is0692vs@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 20, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
github-user-summary Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 21, 2026 4:47am

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@is0692vs has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 499eae34-1432-4f7d-9f45-657ccf0bdfe9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87d145d and 6a92731.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/hooks/__tests__/useDashboardData.test.ts
  • src/hooks/__tests__/useDashboardData.test.tsx
  • src/hooks/useDashboardData.test.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch jules-14916218358757885008-cb2af12f

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@is0692vs
Copy link
Contributor Author

レビュー内容を整理します。

  • 現時点で要約対象の review body / inline 指摘は見当たりませんでした。
  • コメント欄は bot 通知中心でした。

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

レビュー内容を整理します。

  • 現時点で要約対象の review body / inline 指摘は見当たりませんでした。
  • コメント欄は bot 通知中心でした。

確認しました。対応が必要な指摘事項はないようですので、このまま進めます。

…rapper

Co-authored-by: is0692vs <135803462+is0692vs@users.noreply.github.com>
@is0692vs
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 21, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Co-authored-by: is0692vs <135803462+is0692vs@users.noreply.github.com>
@is0692vs is0692vs merged commit 6cefedd into main Mar 21, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@is0692vs is0692vs deleted the jules-14916218358757885008-cb2af12f branch March 21, 2026 06:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant