Conversation
…rapper Co-authored-by: is0692vs <135803462+is0692vs@users.noreply.github.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
レビュー内容を整理します。
|
確認しました。対応が必要な指摘事項はないようですので、このまま進めます。 |
…rapper Co-authored-by: is0692vs <135803462+is0692vs@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Co-authored-by: is0692vs <135803462+is0692vs@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull request addresses the testing gap for the
useDashboardDatahook and its related hooks (useYearInReview,useDashboardStats).🎯 What:
The testing gap addressed was that
useDashboardData.tslacked proper integration and unit testing that utilized SWR's native caching mechanisms correctly. Specifically, the hooks needed to be wrapped in aSessionProvidermock and anSWRConfigmock to properly simulate UI state without resorting to brittle SWR module-level mocks.📊 Coverage:
The following scenarios are now fully tested across all exported functions in
src/hooks/useDashboardData.ts:{ isLoading: false }and avoid fetching data.fetch, and return the parsed data and standard UI state.fetcherlogic.✨ Result:
Test coverage for
src/hooks/useDashboardData.tsis now at 100% (Statements, Branches, Functions, Lines). Tests are robust and deterministically isolate state using<SWRConfig provider={() => new Map()} />. The redundant top-leveluseDashboardData.test.tshas been removed, centralizing the robust tests in thesrc/hooks/__tests__directory as.test.tsxto fully support JSX test wrappers.PR created automatically by Jules for task 14916218358757885008 started by @is0692vs