Closed
Conversation
Member
Author
BTW, one concern that was raised when discussing this was the class Signal<T> {
dispatch(arg:T) {}
}
var signal = new Signal<void>();
signal.dispatch(); // no argument requiredI personally don't like it to much though, because it makes arity unclear and I think |
Member
Author
|
Hmm, maybe I'll draft a haxe-evolution proposal about Void unit type... |
Member
Author
OK, here we go: HaxeFoundation/haxe-evolution#76 |
Member
Author
|
I'll close this since we kind of agreed that we could re-use |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an unit type extracted from #9111, serving the same purpose as e.g.
tink.core.Noise: to be a dummy value in value-places created by type parameters (e.g.Future<NoData>,Signal<NoData>and such).Sample usage:
It's implemented as a single-variant enum abstract over Dynamic and is always just a
nullat run-time which is probably the most lightweight implementation.I still think that normal
Voidcould work the same way, but looks like that's not going to happen, so let's at least add this one, because it is needed very often and currently everyone has to implement their own thing.Also I'm not sure if it should or should not be in
StdTypes.