Automation (remediation) documentation#39
Conversation
New Remediation group under the Platform product: - platform/remediation/overview: the Remediate button, where the fix PR lands (stacked on an open source PR vs default branch), run outcomes, and the GitHub App contents:write permission note. - platform/remediation/automations: creating automations (environments, triggers/rules, actions, notifiers), firing semantics, repo-config precedence, Slack/email notifications, and run history. - platform/remediation/credits: per-run deduction, buying credits, auto top-up (trigger/target/monthly limit), and the paused state. Updates: - code-review/config: document the remediation block (auto, inclusive severity defaulting to critical, exclusive override of org automations). - code-review/findings-feedback: short Remediate section linking over. - docs.json: add the Remediation navigation group. Documents the feature landing in HacktronAI/web#475. Changelog entry is left to the automated changelog workflow once the feature deploys. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ture Rename the nav group and pages: platform/remediation/* becomes platform/automations/* with Automations as the overview page and Remediation as a feature page inside it. Reword intros to match the hierarchy and update all cross-links. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3348b3b9c9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
The absent-config and fail-open descriptions claimed an empty or missing config.yaml only means normal scans and a green check. With organization automations, a repository without a remediation block falls through to enabled org automations, which can start credit-consuming remediation runs. Say so in both places and point at remediation.auto: false as the per-repo opt-out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Updated platform/automations/overview.mdx - Created images/Screenshot-2026-07-09-at-1.22.05-PM.png - Created images/automations-1.png - Created images/Screenshot-2026-07-09-at-1.19.23-PM.png Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
- Updated platform/automations/overview.mdx - Created images/image.png - Created images/image-1.png - Created images/image-2.png Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
- Updated platform/automations/remediation.mdx - Created images/image.png Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8f36460566
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
- Updated platform/automations/overview.mdx - Created images/automations-1-1.png Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
- Updated platform/automations/remediation.mdx - Created images/image-3.png Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
This comment was marked as low quality.
This comment was marked as low quality.
Sorry, something went wrong.
- Updated platform/automations/overview.mdx - Updated platform/automations/remediation.mdx Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
- Updated platform/automations/credits.mdx Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
- Updated platform/automations/overview.mdx Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 70cdaf09fb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Reframe the Automations overview around triggers, actions, and notifiers, with Autofix as the first available action and a note that more actions are coming — the later copyedit passes had rewritten the intro as autofix-only. Also note the $50 starting credit balance for Code Review subscribers and add the remediation PR screenshot. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Updated platform/automations/remediation.mdx Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
- Updated platform/account-settings.mdx - Updated platform/security-settings.mdx - Updated platform/automations/overview.mdx - Created images/image.png Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
- Updated platform/automations/overview.mdx Mintlify-Source: dashboard-editor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e2a357e608
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| Run statuses mirror [remediation outcomes](/platform/automations/remediation#outcomes): **Running**, **Success**, **No fix needed**, **False positive**, and **Failed**. You can filter the history by status and search it. | ||
|
|
||
| <img | ||
| src="/images/run-history.png" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The light-mode run history screenshot points to /images/run-history.png, but that file is not present in the repo (the commit adds images/image.png for the dark variant, and repo-wide image search shows no run-history.png). Users viewing this section outside dark mode will get a broken image where the run history example should be displayed.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
2 participants
Mintlify
1 thread from 1 user in Mintlify