Repository navigation
Build tagged releases and preserve publisher history - #10
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
Security findingsAdvisory findings (1)ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This comment was marked as low quality.
This comment was marked as low quality.
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggered
Here are some automated security review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: dc8b2e2447
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
- You comment "@codex security review"
- A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
This comment was marked as low quality.
This comment was marked as low quality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8a89306646
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
This comment was marked as low quality.
This comment was marked as low quality.
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Manual publishing currently reads package files from the selected workflow branch. Check out the requested release tag separately and use its package files with the reviewed publisher tooling. Resolve tags with the manifest semver grammar so prereleases containing
-vare preserved and tag values reach the shell through environment variables.A public 404 can hide a delisted or unpublished extension. The old create-conflict fallback could update that record with an empty release history. Record whether the payload's history read found the extension, use that same result for POST/PUT, and stop conflicting creates for manual correction.
Enforce the API's 100,000 UTF-16-unit README limit and serialize compact UTF-8 JSON so valid Unicode content is measured against the 256 KiB cap correctly. The merged API still returns pending submissions and permits explicit approval by a mapped publisher with publish rights; that flow is retained.