Skip to content

T-3D-3D #198

Description

@weidemann

Measuring FCS with fluorescent proteins produces complex decays. For simplicity, Often I choose the T-3D-3D model with a single triplet to account for all blinking with a single time (Tau_trp) that is supposed to be still shorter than the protein diffusion (Tau_1) and couple of % for a longer diffusion term (Tau_2> ms) that covers longtail correlations of different origin (small amounts of aggregates, PSF distortions, cellular movements etc) . In aequous buffers, blinking times and the globular protein diffusion can be quite close.

I noticed many times that applying the confocal T-3D-3D model shows coupling of the triplet time (Tau_trp) and the shorter diffusion time (Tau_1). During fitting, both values run in parallel. I could not get rid of the stickyness of these two parameters. In contrast, applying the simpler T-3D model, both triplet and diffuion can be properly separated, although only a couple of µs apart.

Is there a technical reason for coupling of these two parameteres during fitting? I attach an example:
example-T-3D-3D.zip

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions