Repository navigation
docs: state the 1.0 scope, the backend tiers and the versioning policy #897
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
LeeroyHannigan
wants to merge
11
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
docs/662-scope-tiers-versioning
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+153
−22
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6a2a639
docs: state the 1.0 scope, the backend tiers and the versioning policy
LeeroyHannigan 68a00a3
Merge branch 'main' into docs/662-scope-tiers-versioning
LeeroyHannigan 6fe9665
docs: say that the Cassandra checks are required
LeeroyHannigan 093786c
docs: say SigV4 authentication in the dev-mode feature comments
LeeroyHannigan 0365f0c
docs: split the backup store paragraph of the upgrade manual
LeeroyHannigan 9d136d2
docs: say how a backend moves between tiers
LeeroyHannigan 7f937f0
docs: correct the restore and backup store text of the upgrade manual
LeeroyHannigan 4e44a88
docs: require reliably green CI for the beta tier too
LeeroyHannigan 1463d68
docs: drop a false sentence about a second server's backup store
LeeroyHannigan 2ec6290
Merge branch 'main' into docs/662-scope-tiers-versioning
LeeroyHannigan 8493d41
docs: correct the store root rule and two pointers of the upgrade manual
LeeroyHannigan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm reluctant to introduce tiers unless we have a process/policy for how a backend moves from one tier to another. I also thought that last week we'd converged on "a backend is production (or stable) if the ExtendDB CI is reliably green for it".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The three tiers are the ones #662 asks for, so I kept them. 9d136d2 and 4e44a88 add the rule for moving between them, built on that definition. Both tiers for production, stable and beta, now say that the ExtendDB CI is reliably green for the backend. A backend moves up one tier in a minor release. Before that, the maintainers agree in an issue that its CI has been reliably green and that its known limits fit the higher tier. It moves down only through the deprecation steps of the versioning policy.