Try to bind repo from the host, see if we can reproduce issue #56#58
Try to bind repo from the host, see if we can reproduce issue #56#58casparvl wants to merge 9 commits into
Conversation
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-surf architecture:x86_64/amd/zen4 accelerator:nvidia/cc90 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
Hm, it's not running into the issue but it's also not bind-mounting: This should contain something like Which also suggests no bind-mounting is happening. |
That doesn't look as intended... |
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-surf architecture:x86_64/amd/zen4 accelerator:nvidia/cc90 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
Original error reproduced in 13595155. E.g. |
|
Let's try to do an bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-surf architecture:x86_64/amd/zen4 accelerator:nvidia/cc90 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
Let's try to do an bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-surf architecture:x86_64/amd/zen4 accelerator:nvidia/cc90 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
Get another ls output, so we can see if bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-surf architecture:x86_64/amd/zen4 accelerator:nvidia/cc90 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
Ok, so there was a point at which I could write: Next, let's see if we can do it closer to the |
|
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-surf architecture:x86_64/amd/zen4 accelerator:nvidia/cc90 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
Ok, writing also works at the level of Going one level deeper, into bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-surf architecture:x86_64/amd/zen4 accelerator:nvidia/cc90 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
Now try from within the function that fails bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-surf architecture:x86_64/amd/zen4 accelerator:nvidia/cc90 |
|
New job on instance
|
|
Hmmm Not how is owned by |
|
Closing this. I managed to reproduce the issue at #56 , but as discussed in that issue there doesn't seem to be an easy fix, and it's not high enough priority to investigate further. |
Related to #56