Vulnerable sample for Action test#1
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@souro1212 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Comment |
🔐 Secure Code Review (AI)Risk Summary: High (1), Medium (1)
Safeguards Checklist:
The diff is small and focused, but it introduces significant security risks that need to be addressed immediately. Models can make mistakes. Verify before merging. |
Micro-Learning Topic: Injection attack (Detected by phrase)Matched on "injection attack"Injection flaws, such as SQL, NoSQL, OS, and LDAP injection, occur when untrusted data is sent to an interpreter as part of a command or query. The attacker’s hostile data can trick the interpreter into executing unintended commands or accessing data without proper authorization. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Top_Ten_Project Try a challenge in Secure Code WarriorHelpful references
|
This PR intentionally adds risky patterns for testing ai-secure-code-review-action.