Skip to content

Comments

Provide Home Manager module for Determinate Nix#158

Open
lucperkins wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
lucperkins/eng-1247-provide-minimal-home-manager-module-for-detnix
Open

Provide Home Manager module for Determinate Nix#158
lucperkins wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
lucperkins/eng-1247-provide-minimal-home-manager-module-for-detnix

Conversation

@lucperkins
Copy link
Member

@lucperkins lucperkins commented Feb 9, 2026

This module is more of a compatibility shim but could be useful in some cases.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Home Manager support exported as a new, reusable module for integrating Home Manager configurations.
  • Documentation

    • Added a Home Manager guidance section with configuration examples, integration notes, and a public reference link.
  • Tests

    • Added test coverage demonstrating Home Manager integration and a sample user configuration for validation.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds Home Manager integration: a new module that sets nix.package = null, exports it as homeManagerModules.default in the flake outputs, updates tests to build a Home Manager activation package, and documents usage and examples in README.md.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Flake exports
flake.nix
Adds homeManagerModules.default export pointing to the new Home Manager module.
Home Manager module
modules/home-manager/default.nix
New Nix module that declares nix.package = null.
Tests (flake)
tests/flake.nix
Adds home-manager flake input, updates nix-darwin input handling, and introduces aarch64-darwin.home-manager output building an activationPackage using the new module with test user settings.
Documentation
README.md
Adds Home Manager guidance, example configurations (inputs/modules), and a public reference link for home-manager.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer (flake consumer)
    participant Flake as Determinate Flake (outputs)
    participant HM as Home Manager flake
    participant Nixpkgs as nixpkgs

    Dev->>Flake: include flake as input / use `homeManagerModules.default`
    Flake->>HM: provide module to compose into Home Manager configuration
    Flake->>Nixpkgs: reference for system-specific pkgs import
    HM->>Nixpkgs: import pkgs { system = "aarch64-darwin" }
    HM->>HM: build homeManagerConfiguration with modules (including module from Flake)
    HM->>Dev: produce activationPackage (home-manager activation)
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • cole-h
  • colemickens

Poem

🐰 A flake hopped in with modules to share,

nix.package set to null with careful care,
Home Manager joins, activation in sight,
Tests build and docs show how to take flight. ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Provide Home Manager module for Determinate Nix' directly and concisely summarizes the main change: adding a Home Manager module to the Determinate Nix project. This is confirmed by the changes across README.md, flake.nix, modules/home-manager/default.nix, and tests/flake.nix.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch lucperkins/eng-1247-provide-minimal-home-manager-module-for-detnix

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

🧹 Recent nitpick comments
README.md (1)

168-188: First example snippet lacks flake context including the determinate input.

The second example (Line 193) is a full flake with inputs, but this first snippet references inputs.home-manager and inputs.nixpkgs without showing where they come from. Since the purpose of this first example is to show the manual approach (without the determinate module), consider either adding a minimal inputs block or adding a brief note that users should add the necessary inputs. This would keep it consistent with every other example in this README.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 199-205: The example call to
inputs.home-manager.lib.homeManagerConfiguration is missing the required pkgs
parameter; update the homeConfigurations.my-system invocation (the
inputs.home-manager.lib.homeManagerConfiguration {...} block) to include a pkgs
attribute (e.g. pkgs = inputs.pkgs or pkgs =
inputs.nixpkgs.legacyPackages.x86_64-linux) alongside modules so the
configuration evaluates correctly.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

168-207: Minor style nit: repeated phrasing across the two examples.

Lines 171 and 186 both use the identical sentence "This configuration, for example, would be compatible with Determinate Nix". Consider varying the wording for the second instance, e.g., "You can achieve the same result using the provided module:".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant