Skip to content

docs: adopt the Why→What→Verification PR template and flag v1.8.0 in develop#205

Merged
DemchaAV merged 1 commit into
developfrom
docs/pr-template-and-v1.8-status
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

docs: adopt the Why→What→Verification PR template and flag v1.8.0 in develop#205
DemchaAV merged 1 commit into
developfrom
docs/pr-template-and-v1.8-status

Conversation

@DemchaAV

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Why

The PR template still used the old Summary / Type-of-change / Checklist form,
and the README release-status line advertised a placeholder "v1.7.2 housekeeping
cycle" in develop — but develop now carries the v1.8.0 "illustrative" work
(native vector charts, inline sparklines, ShapeOutline.Path clip, sharper
SVG-reader errors).

What changed

  • .github/pull_request_template.md — rewritten to the house style: Why →
    What changed → Verification (with a Lane line) and a collapsible pre-merge
    checklist, dropping the empty-placeholder Summary / Type-of-change form.
  • README.md — the release-status line now reads "In develop: v1.8.0 —
    illustrative (additive, zero breaking from v1.7)".

Verification

  • ./mvnw test -Dtest=DocumentationCoverageTest -pl . → BUILD SUCCESS, 5 tests:
    the README canonical-DSL / no-legacy-token guard stays green after the edit.

Lane: docs — no code, no public-API change.

…develop

Rewrite .github/pull_request_template.md to the house style — Why, What changed,
Verification (with a Lane line), and a collapsible pre-merge checklist —
replacing the old Summary / Type-of-change / Checklist form. Update the README
release-status line: develop now carries v1.8.0 "illustrative" (native vector
charts, inline sparklines, ShapeOutline.Path clip, sharper SVG-reader errors),
not the placeholder v1.7.2 housekeeping cycle.
@DemchaAV DemchaAV merged commit 5353b29 into develop Jun 17, 2026
11 checks passed
@DemchaAV DemchaAV deleted the docs/pr-template-and-v1.8-status branch June 17, 2026 08:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant