Skip to content

[CONTP-2052] move CI to ddoghq/images instead of DataDog/images - #313

Draft
adel121 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
adelhajhassan/move-to-ddoghq
Draft

[CONTP-2052] move CI to ddoghq/images instead of DataDog/images#313
adel121 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
adelhajhassan/move-to-ddoghq

Conversation

@adel121

@adel121 adel121 commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Updates CI pipeline to use ddoghq/images instead of DataDog/images

Motivation

CI migration.

Additional Notes

Do not merge yet

@adel121 adel121 changed the title move CI to ddoghq/images instead of DataDog/images [CONTP-2052] move CI to ddoghq/images instead of DataDog/images Sep 7, 2026
@adel121 adel121 added this to the v0.11 milestone Sep 7, 2026
@adel121 adel121 added the tooling Issue linked to the repository tooling label Sep 7, 2026
@datadog-prod-us1-4

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pipelines  Code Coverage

⚠️ Warnings

Your PR has failed checks. Please review the issues below and take necessary action before merging.

🚦 3 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/extendeddaemonset | Service catalog metadata validation — 🔧 Needs a code fix, caused by this PR

View more details · View in GitLab

pull request linter | Check Milestone

View more details · View in GitHub Actions

Missing milestone or qa/skip-qa label.

pull request linter | build

View more details · View in GitHub Actions

This pull request does not contain any of the valid labels: ['bug', 'enhancement', 'documentation', 'tooling'].

ℹ️ Info

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 100.00%
Overall Coverage: 37.14% (-0.06%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: ea6cdb5 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

tooling Issue linked to the repository tooling

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants