Skip to content

[DOCS-15308] Add definitions for iOS RUM view memoryAverage/memoryMax - #39670

Open
melamos wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
melissa.amos/docs-15308-ios-view-memory-attrs
Open

[DOCS-15308] Add definitions for iOS RUM view memoryAverage/memoryMax#39670
melamos wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
melissa.amos/docs-15308-ios-view-memory-attrs

Conversation

@melamos

@melamos melamos commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Fixes DOCS-15308

Adds public definitions for the iOS RUM view memoryAverage/memoryMax attributes, following the same pattern used for the Android view.memory_average/view.memory_max attributes (RUM-17548). Explains what memory is measured, how the SDK calculates it, the default sampling frequency, and configuration options.

Flutter's memoryAverage/memoryMax values are forwarded from the underlying native iOS/Android SDK rather than computed independently, and the Flutter Data Collected page already defers to the iOS/Android pages for event-specific attributes, so no separate Flutter page update is needed.

Merge readiness

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

  • ⚠️ Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). If you've already created your PR with an incorrect branch name, please rename your branch and open a fresh PR.
  • 🤖 New: Comment with /review to run an automated check that catches common issues before a Documentation team member reviews your PR.

AI assistance

Drafted with Claude Code: researched iOS/Flutter SDK source to confirm exact memory-attribute semantics, then wrote the doc update.

Additional notes

Semantics were derived from reading dd-sdk-ios source directly (VitalMemoryReader.swift, VitalInfoSampler.swift, RUMViewScope.swift), not yet confirmed with Engineering. Per the ticket, this should be posted to #rum-mobile and reviewed by Rosa before merging.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend cdocs labels Sep 2, 2026
@melamos
melamos marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2026 15:46
@melamos
melamos requested review from a team as code owners September 2, 2026 15:46
@melamos
melamos requested a review from rtrieu September 2, 2026 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend cdocs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants