Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4f7c999133
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
![datadog-official[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1358509?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
More details
The flow path keeps legacy attach behavior and uses context swap with the new context manager. Async handlers keep their own scopes.
🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 4f7c999 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed
PR vs. master results
Commit: Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion. |
43f284a to
eaf2cf7
Compare
|
@codex review |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
2 participants
What Does This Do
Akka and Pekko HTTP flows intentionally keep request context active while an
element moves through the stream.
With the legacy scope manager, the flow attaches a scope and relies on either
the response path or actor rollback to close it. With the new context manager,
the equivalent operation is a context swap rather than an attached scope.
This change:
Context.swap()for HTTP flows with the new context manager.synchronous and blocked-response paths.
flow no longer owns the current context.
directly.
flowchart TD A[HTTP request enters flow] --> B{Legacy context manager?} B -->|Yes| C[Attach request scope] C --> D[Process request] D --> E[Response closes scope<br/>or actor rollback cleans it up] B -->|No| F[Swap to request context<br/>and remember previous context] F --> G[Process request] G --> H{Request context still current<br/>when flow closes?} H -->|Yes| I[Restore previous context] H -->|No| J[Actor boundary restores context] E --> K[Finish request span] I --> K J --> KMotivation
Avoid mixing legacy scope rollback with the new context manager while ensuring
that immediate completion paths cannot leave the request context active.
Additional Notes
Contributor Checklist
type:and (comp:orinst:) labels in addition to any other useful labelsclose,fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issueUse
solvesinstead, and assign the PR milestone to the issueJira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]