Skip to content

Use configured mirrors for buildSrc tests - #12389

Open
AlexeyKuznetsov-DD wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexeyk/route-buildsrc-test-dependencies-through-depot
Open

Use configured mirrors for buildSrc tests#12389
AlexeyKuznetsov-DD wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
alexeyk/route-buildsrc-test-dependencies-through-depot

Conversation

@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

Refactors buildSrc test fixtures and Muzzle repository setup to use configured dependency mirrors when present. Without mirror configuration, tests continue to use the standard public repositories. Range-resolution tests use local fixtures where possible.

Motivation

Keep build-logic tests consistent with repository configuration in automated builds while preserving a zero-configuration local workflow for contributors.

Additional Notes

Validation:

  • ./gradlew -p buildSrc :test -PrunBuildSrcTests --rerun-tasks without mirror configuration: 291 tests passed
  • ./gradlew :buildSrc:test -PrunBuildSrcTests --rerun-tasks with mirror configuration: 291 tests passed
  • ./gradlew -p buildSrc spotlessCheck

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: N/A

@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD AlexeyKuznetsov-DD added tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes type: refactoring comp: tooling Build & Tooling tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM labels Sep 3, 2026
@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD AlexeyKuznetsov-DD self-assigned this Sep 3, 2026
@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD
AlexeyKuznetsov-DD marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2026 00:52
@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD
AlexeyKuznetsov-DD requested review from a team as code owners September 3, 2026 00:52
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-03T00:56:12.313157Z 7b493be Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The code keeps public repositories when no proxy exists. It uses the configured mirror when a proxy exists, with no reportable defect.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 7b493be · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

This comment has been minimized.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.83 s 14.72 s [-0.3%; +1.8%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 13.56 s 13.61 s [-1.2%; +0.5%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 17.02 s 17.18 s [-5.3%; +3.4%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.45 s 17.64 s [-1.8%; -0.2%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 17.57 s 17.32 s [+0.2%; +2.8%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 17.61 s 17.54 s [-0.4%; +1.2%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.61 s 16.71 s [-1.6%; +0.4%] (no difference)

Commit: 7b493be2 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@AlexeyKuznetsov-DD

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/gitlab resync-job-status --bypass-required-checks-syncing-strategy

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-03 02:43:46 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /gitlab resync-job-status --bypass-required-checks-syncing-strategy


2026-09-03 02:50:21 UTC ℹ️ Devflow: /gitlab resync-job-status --bypass-required-checks-syncing-strategy

392 jobs status updated and 582 skipped for a total of 974 jobs, 1 pipeline status(es) synced

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp: tooling Build & Tooling tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes type: refactoring

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant