Fix TIA missing line coverage response field

[daniel-mohedano]

What Does This Do

Updates TIA skippable-test response parsing and test fixtures to use _is_missing_line_code_coverage.

Motivation

Aligns the Java tracer with the backend response contract.

Additional Notes

Validated with the focused CI Visibility configuration test, Spotless, and backend mock compilation.

[datadog-prod-us1-5]

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 62.75% (+3.60%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: b395260 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!}

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - sbt-scalatest

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	58.14	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.71	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.71	44/190
agentEvpProxy	57.49	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	-

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - nebula-release-plugin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	35.63	36.42	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.79	36.42	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.79	24/98
agentless	35.56	35.70	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.14	35.70	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.14	24/98
agentlessCodeCoverage	44.66	44.48	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.18	44.48	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.18	24/98
agentlessLineCoverage	55.68	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.25	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.25	24/99

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - reactive-streams-jvm

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	22.22	21.65	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.57	21.65	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.57	22/103
agentless	18.71	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.49	18.82	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.11	23/99
agentlessCodeCoverage	20.97	19.59	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.38	19.99	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.98	23/97
agentlessLineCoverage	27.70	26.45	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.25	26.98	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.72	12/58

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - pass4s

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	11.97	9.73	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.24	9.92	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.05	22/86
agentless	12.54	9.35	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +3.19	9.73	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.81	22/86
agentlessCodeCoverage	20.01	16.36	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +3.65	15.41	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +4.60	20/82

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - netflix-zuul

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	86.66	87.80	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.14	87.80	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.14	22/100
agentless	79.59	81.05	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.46	81.05	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.46	22/100
agentlessCodeCoverage	95.10	95.12	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.02	95.12	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.02	23/99
agentlessLineCoverage	110.22	111.62	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.40	111.62	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.40	25/101

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - heliboard

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	10.02	10.13	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.11	10.13	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.11	23/94

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - sonar-kotlin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	13.04	12.62	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.42	12.87	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.17	22/94
agentless	11.78	11.88	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.10	11.88	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.10	22/93
agentlessCodeCoverage	14.72	14.81	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.09	15.11	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.39	22/93
agentlessLineCoverage	16.89	17.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.84	17.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.84	21/92

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[dd-octo-sts]

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite	Status
Startup	🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results

Scenario	Candidate	master	Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent	14.73 s	14.74 s	[-0.9%; +0.7%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent	13.60 s	13.65 s	[-1.2%; +0.4%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent	17.60 s	17.54 s	[-0.6%; +1.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent	17.33 s	17.55 s	[-2.1%; -0.4%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent	17.46 s	17.10 s	[+0.9%; +3.3%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent	17.58 s	17.50 s	[-0.6%; +1.6%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent	16.50 s	16.63 s	[-1.8%; +0.3%] (no difference)

Commit: b3952603 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI

---

Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - jolokia

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	95.58	93.23	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +2.35	95.12	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.46	26/104
agentless	90.95	89.58	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.37	89.58	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.37	25/102
agentlessCodeCoverage	98.82	99.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.18	99.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.18	25/100
agentlessLineCoverage	100.91	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.91	101.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.09	26/104

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - okhttp

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	19.16	19.99	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.83	19.59	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.43	22/97
agentless	18.77	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.43	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.43	23/95
agentlessCodeCoverage	21.21	22.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.33	22.54	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.33	22/95
agentlessLineCoverage	37.32	38.67	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.35	38.67	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.35	23/96

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - spring_boot

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	16.40	16.04	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.36	16.36	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.04	21/92
agentless	9.72	9.73	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.01	9.92	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.20	21/92
agentlessCodeCoverage	13.62	13.40	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.22	13.40	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.22	21/92
agentlessLineCoverage	22.67	22.09	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.58	22.09	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.58	21/90

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Test Environment - sonar-java

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	9.90	9.92	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.02	11.65	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.75	25/104
agentless	16.33	7.35	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +8.98	11.65	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +4.68	25/103
agentlessCodeCoverage	65.56	70.46	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -4.90	74.82	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -9.26	25/103
agentlessLineCoverage	112.44	107.25	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +5.19	111.62	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.82	24/102

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-09T10:32:49.193859Z	bc038c0	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[datadog-prod-us1-5]

More details

The response DTO and related test data use _is_missing_line_code_coverage. This change matches the stated backend contract.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit bc038c0 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}