Skip to content

[Native] Downgrade high-frequency ReJIT logs to debug - #9215

Merged
lucaspimentel merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
lpimentel/downgrade-rejit-logs-debug
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

[Native] Downgrade high-frequency ReJIT logs to debug#9215
lucaspimentel merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
lpimentel/downgrade-rejit-logs-debug

Conversation

@lucaspimentel

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel commented Sep 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Changes two native log calls in rejit_handler.cpp from Logger::Info to Logger::Debug:

  • "NGEN:: Processed with N inliners"
  • "Request ReJIT done for N methods"

Reason for change

These are the two highest-frequency native info logs we've sampled, and they are written unconditionally (not gated on DD_TRACE_DEBUG). Customers on Azure Functions accumulate gigabytes of native tracer logs in Kudu storage with debug logging off. See SLES-2871 for a concrete example: ~32K log files / ~20 GB filled a customer's disk and broke deploys, with DD_TRACE_DEBUG not enabled. These two messages are the biggest single contributors to that volume.

Implementation details

Two-line change; no API or config surface changes. In-repo precedent: #8618 downgraded similar high-frequency debugger-probe logs to debug.

Test coverage

It builds?

Other details

Out of scope (follow-ups if wanted): a general verbosity knob for the native logger (today it's a binary debug toggle fed solely from DD_TRACE_DEBUG)

@lucaspimentel
lucaspimentel force-pushed the lpimentel/downgrade-rejit-logs-debug branch from 918f590 to f778d73 Compare September 8, 2026 17:56
@lucaspimentel
lucaspimentel marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2026 17:56
@lucaspimentel
lucaspimentel requested review from a team as code owners September 8, 2026 17:56
@lucaspimentel
lucaspimentel requested review from link04 and removed request for a team September 8, 2026 17:56
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-08T17:59:17.579460Z f778d73 Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-08T18:01:54.600496Z f778d73 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@zacharycmontoya

zacharycmontoya commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#9027 (comment)

Maybe we can implement OTEL_LOG_LEVEL 🤔

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel added the area:native-library Automatic instrumentation native C++ code (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.Native) label Sep 8, 2026
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-09-08 18:48:50

Comparing candidate commit f778d73 in PR branch lpimentel/downgrade-rejit-logs-debug with baseline commit 6a9dd6a in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 72 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 66 known flaky benchmarks, 60 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-7831.930op/s; -7388.700op/s] or [-9.286%; -8.761%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-9014.838op/s; -7534.497op/s] or [-9.166%; -7.661%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.573KB; +1.573KB] or [+47.789%; +47.804%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+308.967ms; +311.291ms] or [+153.320%; +154.474%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-57.419op/s; -53.450op/s] or [-10.331%; -9.617%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.011KB; +1.011KB] or [+37.485%; +37.498%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+375.861ms; +379.916ms] or [+296.953%; +300.157%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+69.795op/s; +75.357op/s] or [+9.202%; +9.936%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.090KB; +1.090KB] or [+40.417%; +40.429%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+390.440ms; +394.807ms] or [+345.525%; +349.390%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.725KB; +4.726KB] or [+99.482%; +99.497%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60228.453op/s; -59862.553op/s] or [-46.861%; -46.576%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.848KB; +3.848KB] or [+81.379%; +81.391%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.229ms; -12.049ms] or [-7.580%; -5.627%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-62287.657op/s; -59514.837op/s] or [-45.466%; -43.442%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.576KB; +4.576KB] or [+98.954%; +98.966%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48735.891op/s; -46487.517op/s] or [-44.063%; -42.030%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.348KB; +1.348KB] or [+109.063%; +109.078%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-301013.016op/s; -297734.652op/s] or [-30.735%; -30.400%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+511 bytes; +512 bytes] or [+41.822%; +41.834%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-27.039ms; -22.167ms] or [-12.058%; -9.886%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-95277.002op/s; -72570.696op/s] or [-10.179%; -7.753%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.312KB; +1.312KB] or [+108.600%; +108.616%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-167417.324op/s; -150397.924op/s] or [-24.055%; -21.609%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72354.574op/s; -71598.545op/s] or [-48.694%; -48.185%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-74678.273op/s; -71784.963op/s] or [-47.517%; -45.676%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56039.229op/s; -53419.599op/s] or [-44.643%; -42.556%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+192015.352op/s; +256998.903op/s] or [+6.403%; +8.569%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.416ms; -15.083ms] or [-8.950%; -6.953%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.047ms; +301.051ms] or [+149.923%; +150.425%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1034.910op/s; +1053.772op/s] or [+11.430%; +11.639%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.369ms; +302.488ms] or [+150.972%; +152.546%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2093.378op/s; +2359.220op/s] or [+16.011%; +18.045%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.576ms; +302.991ms] or [+151.407%; +152.623%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1808.186op/s; +1934.647op/s] or [+17.457%; +18.678%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.924ms; +297.883ms] or [+145.837%; +146.308%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+579.943op/s; +587.995op/s] or [+15.374%; +15.588%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.139ms; +302.349ms] or [+146.727%; +147.807%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2845.754op/s; +2900.056op/s] or [+41.343%; +42.132%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.604ms; +301.797ms] or [+150.241%; +150.838%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1473.338op/s; +1499.088op/s] or [+29.245%; +29.756%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-130.681µs; -123.775µs] or [-26.831%; -25.413%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+703.934op/s; +753.155op/s] or [+34.285%; +36.682%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-133.932µs; -106.219µs] or [-30.717%; -24.361%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+801.525op/s; +939.832op/s] or [+34.847%; +40.860%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-131.180µs; -108.536µs] or [-28.106%; -23.254%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+672.337op/s; +765.938op/s] or [+31.036%; +35.357%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-115.498µs; -110.002µs] or [-31.184%; -29.700%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1150.545op/s; +1219.270op/s] or [+42.611%; +45.156%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-99.005µs; -75.186µs] or [-31.607%; -24.003%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1112.747op/s; +1323.182op/s] or [+34.688%; +41.247%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-124.589µs; -101.799µs] or [-34.083%; -27.848%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1104.940op/s; +1255.539op/s] or [+39.652%; +45.056%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.404ms; +300.138ms] or [+149.433%; +149.800%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+206.749ms; +280.041ms] or [+224.642%; +304.276%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+714.864op/s; +970.819op/s] or [+5.874%; +7.977%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+241.234ms; +306.198ms] or [+183.166%; +232.493%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+321.096ms; +362.557ms] or [+147.637%; +166.700%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-526.059op/s; -485.076op/s] or [-47.666%; -43.953%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+202.738ms; +335.995ms] or [+86.399%; +143.187%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-671.196op/s; -587.739op/s] or [-44.769%; -39.202%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+347.038ms; +355.951ms] or [+207.569%; +212.900%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-431.103op/s; -392.184op/s] or [-30.017%; -27.307%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-204.156µs; -8.707µs] or [-10.937%; -0.466%]
  • unstable throughput [+14.056op/s; +138.406op/s] or [+2.624%; +25.834%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-169.847µs; -116.215µs] or [-8.604%; -5.887%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+33.755op/s; +48.036op/s] or [+6.664%; +9.483%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.597ms; +303.892ms] or [+152.382%; +153.034%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.100ms; +303.236ms] or [+151.383%; +151.952%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.611ms; +305.926ms] or [+152.019%; +153.684%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.311ms; +303.632ms] or [+151.308%; +152.474%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.118ms; +304.699ms] or [+148.395%; +150.660%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+305.102ms; +309.678ms] or [+154.639%; +156.959%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.247ms; +302.141ms] or [+150.697%; +151.648%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.505ms; +307.740ms] or [+151.269%; +153.380%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+36762.226op/s; +43745.290op/s] or [+7.300%; +8.686%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.647ms; +306.781ms] or [+150.564%; +152.621%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.436ms; -12.770ms] or [-7.643%; -5.938%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+6.647µs; +51.364µs] or [+1.642%; +12.687%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-17.496KB; -17.474KB] or [-6.382%; -6.374%]
  • unstable execution_time [-5.706µs; +51.801µs] or [-1.128%; +10.238%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-16.244KB; -16.224KB] or [-5.922%; -5.915%]
  • unstable execution_time [-72.839µs; -13.634µs] or [-12.623%; -2.363%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+5.918µs; +10.608µs] or [+13.989%; +25.075%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4730.473op/s; -2838.600op/s] or [-19.914%; -11.950%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.574µs; -5.332µs] or [-21.060%; -8.272%]
  • unstable throughput [+1355.914op/s; +3161.948op/s] or [+8.319%; +19.400%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.583ms; +304.170ms] or [+152.942%; +153.745%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.749ms; +306.251ms] or [+154.608%; +155.881%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.078ms; +301.403ms] or [+149.725%; +150.889%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.672ms; +302.663ms] or [+149.858%; +150.850%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.647ms; +304.327ms] or [+151.473%; +152.819%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.333ms; +305.838ms] or [+153.831%; +155.101%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.559ms; +300.700ms] or [+149.421%; +149.991%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61227293.958op/s; +61571030.015op/s] or [+44.590%; +44.840%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+420.934ms; +424.974ms] or [+523.506%; +528.531%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.449ms; +300.495ms] or [+149.358%; +149.880%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+53675.839op/s; +73382.530op/s] or [+6.213%; +8.494%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-60815.882op/s; -57451.366op/s] or [-5.567%; -5.259%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+68655.430op/s; +100624.682op/s] or [+5.314%; +7.789%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+71971.707op/s; +79916.966op/s] or [+7.148%; +7.937%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+32875.953op/s; +41137.859op/s] or [+5.970%; +7.470%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-49498.480op/s; -45702.582op/s] or [-7.244%; -6.689%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9215) and master.

✅ No regressions detected

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

@lucaspimentel
lucaspimentel merged commit 48fcfd7 into master Sep 8, 2026
145 of 146 checks passed
@lucaspimentel
lucaspimentel deleted the lpimentel/downgrade-rejit-logs-debug branch September 8, 2026 21:55
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Sep 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bouwkast bouwkast bouwkast approved these changes
@zacharycmontoya zacharycmontoya zacharycmontoya approved these changes
@link04 link04 Awaiting requested review from link04 link04 is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/apm-sdk-capabilities-dotnet

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:native-library Automatic instrumentation native C++ code (Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.Native)

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.54.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@lucaspimentel @zacharycmontoya @bouwkast