Skip to content

order includes following the style guide#878

Open
manuschneider wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
order_includes
Open

order includes following the style guide#878
manuschneider wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
order_includes

Conversation

@manuschneider
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Follows the C++ style guide.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request reorganizes and cleans up the #include headers across several C++ source files to improve consistency and readability. Standard library headers, third-party library headers, and project-specific headers are now grouped and sorted. There are no review comments to address, and I have no additional feedback to provide.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 29.49%. Comparing base (9d313f5) to head (e7995cc).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #878   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   29.49%   29.49%           
=======================================
  Files         241      241           
  Lines       35523    35524    +1     
  Branches    14780    14780           
=======================================
+ Hits        10476    10477    +1     
  Misses      17791    17791           
  Partials     7256     7256           
Flag Coverage Δ
cpp 29.08% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
python 52.71% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
C++ backend 30.73% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Python bindings 17.09% <ø> (ø)
Python package 52.71% <ø> (ø)
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/BlockFermionicUniTensor.cpp 32.76% <ø> (ø)
src/BlockUniTensor.cpp 37.26% <ø> (ø)
src/DenseUniTensor.cpp 50.22% <ø> (ø)
src/Network.cpp 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Network_base.cpp 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/RegularNetwork.cpp 35.68% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
src/UniTensor_base.cpp 27.86% <ø> (ø)
src/backend/Storage_base.cpp 21.05% <ø> (ø)
src/stat/histogram.cpp 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9d313f5...e7995cc. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@manuschneider manuschneider added the Pending check/approval Issue fixed, and need feedback label Jun 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Pending check/approval Issue fixed, and need feedback

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant