Fix action.yml description output for AI mode + README cleanup

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+name: Bug report
+about: Report something not working as expected
+title: ""
+labels: bug
+assignees: ""
+---
+
+## Describe the bug
+A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
+
+## To Reproduce
+Steps to reproduce the behavior:
+1. Add the workflow file to `...`
+2. Open a PR with `...`
+3. See the generated description
+
+## Expected behavior
+What you expected to happen.
+
+## Actual behavior
+What actually happened (include the generated output if relevant).
+
+## Repository link
+Link to the repo where you're using DocuCraft.
+
+## Workflow file
+If you customized the config, paste your workflow YAML here.
+
+## Environment
+- DocuCraft version: v1 / latest
+- GitHub plan: Free / Team / Enterprise
+- AI mode or template mode: Template / AI

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+blank_issues_enabled: false
+contact_links:
+  - name: Ask a question
+    url: https://github.com/CreativeCodingSolutions/docucraft/discussions
+    about: Please use GitHub Discussions for questions and discussions.

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+name: Feature request
+about: Suggest an idea for DocuCraft
+title: ""
+labels: enhancement
+assignees: ""
+---
+
+## Problem
+What problem would this feature solve? (e.g., "It's annoying when...")
+
+## Solution
+What would you like to see?
+
+## Alternatives
+Any alternative solutions you've considered.
+
+## Context
+What kind of project would you use this with? (size, language, team size)

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/suggest-repo.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+name: Suggest a Repo for DocuCraft
+description: Recommend a repository that should use DocuCraft for better PR descriptions
+labels: ["suggestion"]
+body:
+  - type: input
+    id: repo-url
+    attributes:
+      label: Repository URL
+      description: The GitHub repository URL
+      placeholder: https://github.com/owner/repo
+    validations:
+      required: true
+  - type: textarea
+    id: reason
+    attributes:
+      label: Why would this repo benefit from DocuCraft?
+      description: Briefly describe the PR quality issue you've noticed
+      placeholder: Many PRs have empty or minimal descriptions...
+    validations:
+      required: false

.github/workflows/docucraft.yml

@@ -1,19 +1,15 @@
-name: DocuCraft — Auto PR Descriptions
-
+name: DocuCraft
 on:
   pull_request:
     types: [opened, synchronize]
-
 permissions:
   contents: read
   pull-requests: write
-
 jobs:
-  generate-description:
+  generate:
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     steps:
       - uses: actions/checkout@v4
-      - name: Generate PR description
-        uses: ./.github/actions/docucraft
+      - uses: CreativeCodingSolutions/docucraft@v1
         with:
           github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}