♿ a11y: 사이드바 네비게이션 터치 타깃 44px 확보 (WCAG 2.5.5)#431
Conversation
.workspaceNav__item 이 데스크톱 37px / 모바일 42px 로 렌더되어 WCAG 2.5.5 Target Size(최소 44×44)를 충족하지 못했다. Figma KRDS 디자인 시스템 Implementation Visual Parity 실측 (Playwright boundingClientRect)에서 발견한 delta. - 데스크톱: min-height:44px + flex 세로 중앙 정렬 추가 - 모바일: min-height 42→44px 재검증(Playwright): 데스크톱/모바일 모두 44px 확인. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PTz2mpGv8N6bcMiHLa15bD
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues. FindingsNo blocking findings. SummaryApproval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Frontend: styles.css"]
S1 --> I1["browser runtime and bundle"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Frontend: styles.css"]
R1 --> V1["frontend tests"]
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including frontend/src/styles.css.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects frontend/src/styles.css to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: Accessibility improvement meets WCAG requirements with proper visual verification
- Head SHA:
964608d5b52486eeca6ed925b6260a8e0cdf0961 - Workflow run: 28697144393
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Frontend: styles.css"]
S1 --> I1["browser runtime and bundle"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Frontend: styles.css"]
R1 --> V1["frontend tests"]
1 participant
배경
KRDS 기준 디자인 시스템 구축 과정에서 실제 프런트엔드(
VITE_DEMO_MODE)를 Playwright/Chromium으로 렌더링해 Figma 컴포넌트와 Implementation Visual Parity(실측 boundingClientRect) 를 대조하던 중 발견한 접근성 delta입니다.문제
.workspaceNav__item(사이드바 주요 화면 네비게이션)의 실측 높이가로 렌더되어 WCAG 2.5.5 Target Size (최소 44×44px) 기준을 충족하지 못했습니다.
수정
frontend/src/styles.css:.workspaceNav__item:min-height: 44px+display:flex; align-items:center(세로 중앙 정렬 유지)min-height42 → 44px +justify-content: centerCSS만 변경했고 마크업·동작·색상은 그대로입니다.
검증
수정 후 Playwright로 동일 조건 재측정:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code