docs: maintain durable product-technical gap baseline - #100
seonghobae wants to merge 236 commits into
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough제품·기술 격차 기준을 2026-09-16 기준의 durable commercialization baseline으로 재작성했다. 보호된 Changes제품·기술 격차 기준
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: 🔵 Low · up to The baseline can still permit inconsistent Talent denominator interpretation and make supporting research evidence harder to reproduce, but these are bounded documentation risks rather than immediate runtime failures. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@opencode-agent Please review the current unchanged head against protected |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Baseline handoff only; no source rewrite requested from this lane. #437 exact When baseline state eventually changes, preserve the distinction between historical activation evidence and fresh recovery-attestation evidence; do not treat process-local recovery return values or Draft migration existence as Shipped truth. |
|
Gap-baseline handoff: #437 moved to exact |
|
Gap-baseline handoff only; no source write requested here. Draft composition hardening advanced #436 to |
|
Baseline handoff only; no source write requested from this lane. #437 exact |
|
Gap-baseline handoff only; no baseline source write requested. Draft #437 is now exact |
|
API-01 handoff only; no baseline-source write requested. Current Draft composition authority is #436 |
|
Baseline-owner handoff only; no baseline file edit from this lane. #437 exact |
|
Current downstream composition leaf is Draft #446 exact This improves Draft HTTP correctness but does not create a protected deployable composition application, immutable released Keyverse/Orgmetra/owner authority, canonical exact-tree package/PostgreSQL acceptance, authenticated owner dispatch, cleanup/recovery, immutable release, or full buyer-path p95 evidence. Keep the baseline source state Planned and preserve #100 single-writer ownership; volatile exact heads remain live GitHub authority. |
|
Exact-head currentization evidence for
This PR remains Draft. Fresh hosted exact-head Checks and independent approval remain merge gates; no manual rerun, self-approval, admin bypass, Force Push, or destructive rebase was used. |
|
Review-admission transition for unchanged exact head Source readiness was re-established before transition: PR remains mergeable, unresolved review threads are 0, local exact-head Foundation/manifest validation is GREEN with 58/58 Node tests, and the independent re-review findings were repaired. The body now states the correct boundary: Ready is review admission; terminal exact-head hosted Checks and qualifying independent approval are merge gates, not Ready prerequisites. This transition does not claim protected/released truth, transfer predecessor evidence, approve, merge, or authorize release. No empty push, manual rerun, self-approval, review dismissal, Force Push, destructive rebase, or administrator bypass was used. |
|
Exact-head admission correction — Ready is review admission only. Fresh audit against base
This PR is moved to Draft/Proposed until the causal owner repair is present on a successor exact head and re-audited. Queued/pending work is neither an additional blocker nor passing evidence. No Close, force push, destructive rebase, manual rerun, synthetic status/approval, merge, auto-merge, or bypass was performed. |
Draft admission correction — 2026-10-01Exact head Move back to Draft / Proposed pending repository configuration owner #449, fresh exact-head Security evidence, and independent approval. No result is rerun, synthesized, weakened, or transferred. |
Current review admission — 2026-10-01
301f843c01f301088234c27f758c2a074cfa9aed; protected base remainsdevelop@eb9757f8649aaad026a9865508d9aad50c1a7a4f.Scope
Canonical single-writer lane for
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md. The baseline is a durable commercialization map, not merge authorization: it records protected/released truth and explicit Planned/Active gaps without promoting Draft implementation to shipped capability. Volatile workflow IDs, queue states, mergeability and reviews remain live GitHub truth.Current authority — 2026-09-30
develop@eb9757f8649aaad026a9865508d9aad50c1a7a4f.301f843c01f301088234c27f758c2a074cfa9aed, open · Ready / Proposed. Ready admits review but is not protected truth, approval, merge authorization, or release evidence.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdis now a required manifest-sealed Foundation artifact with linked PRD/TRD/UML/ERD/Context Map views, explicit Gap/Action/Status, and 17 exact-head coordinates covering every Active PR gap plus the causal composition path.API-01remains Planned. feat(composition): prevalidate complete ASGI responses before start #446 is Draft exact3a20660761bc27de74a89c4027d9a89cf74776eb; ci: execute discovered service Python compatibility #447 is Ready exactc19e22d93c4b9e3d6a86f66b69f7e581c10cb249. Neither creates protected deployable composition, immutable released external authority, or buyer-path SLO evidence.npm run validate: 58/58 Node tests plus Python manifest/repository validation andgit diff --check.GOV-01remains Planned, and the regression enforces the mapping.301f843c01f301088234c27f758c2a074cfa9aed: Foundation CI run 36796830293 and SAST run 36796830323 succeeded; Security run 36796830339 failed closed because Dependency Review job 110162113278 received HTTP 403 withcurl_exit=0for exact base/head; CodeQL run 36796830370 was skipped and is not acceptance evidence. Qualifying independent approvals: 0; unresolved review threads: 0. No predecessor evidence transfers.Durable gap states
ASM-01,INT-01, andVAL-01keep their existing owner paths.API-01remains Planned through #432, Proposed architecture #433, and the Draft product-composition stack through #446. Shared-edge configuration, structural admission, ASGI correctness, or process-local evidence integrity alone does not close the buyer-visible Gateway gap.The durable owner dependency for
API-01has materially changed and must be reflected in baseline source: repository-level service/runtime execution now has a concrete canonical implementation lane (#447), not merely an unresolved #260 concept. The causal path is #259 plus truthful #305/#64 metadata integration → #447 Foundation discovery/runtime acceptance → #261 installed-artifact acceptance + #311 PostgreSQL discovery/execution → composition ordinary-forward adoption and one unchanged exact-tree package/PostgreSQL acceptance → #433 independent architecture admission → released Keyverse/Orgmetra/owner API authority → deployable authenticated ASGI host, owner dispatch, cleanup/reload/recovery → realistic[shared edge if deployed] -> composition -> owner HTTP -> PostgreSQLk6/E2E with applicable p95 ≤20 ms → immutable release evidence.This owner-path currentization does not change
API-01from Planned and does not make #447 or #446 shipped capability.API-01current interpretationProtected Architecture/API truth advertises a buyer-facing Orgmetra Gateway while protected executable truth still lacks a supported deployable product-composition boundary.
The durable ownership model remains optional released shared-edge transport plus a separately deployable Orgmetra product-composition application. Composition owns product route admission and request-scoped projection only, not HR truth, Person binding, purpose authorization, owner idempotency/replay/concurrency/error semantics, or scientific truth.
The #434→#446 lineage contributes bounded admission, durable configuration/currentness, routing/request-body and response-lifecycle invariants without changing the Planned gap state. These mechanisms remain Draft source evidence rather than durable release/configuration/deployment authority.
Canonical verification is now explicitly Foundation-owned: #447 executes discovered services from service/package metadata and mandatory owned closure; #261 proves installable wheel/sdist behavior; #311 proves owner-neutral PostgreSQL contracts. The composition stack must consume those capabilities after normal integration and prove one unchanged exact candidate rather than infer execution from another service or use a feature-local workflow/source-tree packaging shortcut.
Shipment still requires released Keyverse/ACL and owner API/operation evidence, durable non-reassignable generation/config/deployment activation authority, canonical Foundation execution of the service, a deployable HTTP composition host, activation/rollback re-admission, fault/security/recovery evidence, supported Kubernetes packaging, and realistic asynchronous
[shared edge if deployed] -> composition -> owner HTTP -> PostgreSQLk6/E2E with applicable p95 <=20 ms.Baseline write rule
Planned/Active work belongs in baseline source when it changes durable buyer/scientific gap state or owner dependency and is explicitly labeled. A Draft PR, local result, ADR or metadata update never becomes Shipped truth merely by being recorded. Conversely, commit churn that does not change durable state stays in owner PR/issue authority rather than repeatedly rewriting this baseline.
This branch remains the only writer for
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md. Future source currentization must preserve truth-state distinctions, exact owner boundaries, causal stack order, standards-profile scope, canonical identity grammar, process-local evidence integrity versus durable provenance, and fail-closed external-contract semantics.2026-10-01 single-writer repair
8f3cc0d7fd217cbc7f3b70431286110bbce71f47: it was Draft, with Foundation CI/SAST terminal-success, Security Scan/CodeQL terminal-failure, zero qualifying approvals and zero unresolved threads.API-01evidence and had no governed outbox-receipt Gap mapping.a7d3f3b74f6ca28bd2dd5ad81e60fad376b6019arecordsORGMETRA-OUTBOX-RECEIPT-01, adds a buyer/audit consequence and causal acceptance action, and expands the regression parser to support multiword semantic Gap identifiers.npm run validatepassed Python repository/manifest validation and 58/58 Node tests;git diff --checkpassed.manifest.jsonseals the changed baseline and regression test.docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md.301f843c01f301088234c27f758c2a074cfa9aedrefreshes the canonical row and regression fixture to feat(outbox): integrate governed delivery receipt into Foundation #448 current head6a06062e9d4f6e07bf4780a60384f264f7983353;npm run validateremains GREEN at 58/58 Node tests plus Python repository/manifest validation.