README: nothing commercial, and the documentation links go to docs.ctrlrun.dev

[arpanghoshal]

Follow-up to #185, which merged before this landed on its branch.

• The tiers section, the early-access and engagement links, the interactive walkthrough links and the closing slogan are the site's material and not the library's; they go.
• Every documentation link uses https://docs.ctrlrun.dev/, which serves each page under ctrlrun.dev/docs at the same path (every link in the file was probed). The three badges that point at pages are regenerated from the docs repository's generator, on CTRLRun/ctrlrun-docs spec: amend v0.3 against an independent review of §4 and §5 #21, rather than edited by hand; merge that PR right after this one so render_badges.py --check agrees on both sides.
• The tests that pinned the old URLs follow: test_repository_signals, test_verify_action, test_readme_assets.

Run locally: 350 kernel tests across the README-adjacent files green; docs-side render_badges --check 0 drifted, lint 0, links 0 broken, README snippets 0 failed, test_home_and_readme_agree green against this branch.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated README links and badges to use the new documentation site at docs.ctrlrun.dev.
  • Replaced the standalone execution-boundary link with a broader documentation navigation table.
  • Removed the Open Source/Pro/Enterprise section and closing slogan from the README.
• Tests
  • Updated README checks to validate the new documentation URLs and revised content.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: b34a7a52-96c4-463d-8dbc-293ad6237c46

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22bacd3 and 7f3843f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• README.md
• tests/test_readme_assets.py
• tests/test_repository_signals.py
• tests/test_verify_action.py

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README now uses docs.ctrlrun.dev links and an expanded documentation index. Commercial sections and the closing call-to-action were removed. Tests were updated for the new URLs and README content.

Changes

Documentation Link Migration

Layer / File(s)	Summary
README documentation updates README.md	Documentation links now use docs.ctrlrun.dev. The README includes an expanded categorized documentation index and no longer includes the standalone execution-boundary link, commercial section, or closing call-to-action.
README test alignment tests/test_readme_assets.py, tests/test_repository_signals.py, tests/test_verify_action.py	Tests now assert the updated documentation URLs. The removed HOMEPAGE_CLOSE constant and its README assertion were also removed.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~8 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e8e79

The README migration and its tests are aligned, with no established merge-blocking risk remaining.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 60.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 5 functions across 3 files. (1 skipped: 1…	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the two main changes: removing commercial README content and updating documentation links to docs.ctrlrun.dev.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 60.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 5 functions across 3 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

📝 Generate docstrings 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch readme/launch-sync

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}