Drop internal positioning language from a source comment - #66
Merged
Merged
Conversation
It was internal strategy language that had leaked into a source comment. The loop it described is the protected execution loop; naming it after a positioning ambition told a reader nothing about what the code does. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
blocksifrdev
changed the title
blocksifrdev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2026
A source comment named the protected execution loop after an internal positioning phrase rather than after what the code does. Renamed to the protected execution loop. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Internal strategy language that had leaked into a source comment. The loop it described is the protected execution loop — naming it after a positioning ambition told a reader nothing about what the code does.
Also retitles issue #48, which carried the phrase publicly.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code